hi have the following problem: I was taken the advance and my car that I bought 2 months before the accident for 52K (according to §25 difference tax/VAT. not passable) was significantly damaged and I don’t like it anymore. the accident opponent was warned police and the debt question is undisputed. the damage was estimated by the reviewer at approx. 19K net plus 2.5K value reduction. purchase value 52.5K. I ordered a new car with day registration in value v on 74K. same car – only just new. the accident was a JW. accident car I did not want to keep and have fictitiously billed. neg. vers. has an offer for the accident car of 30K over the rest of the stock exchange – also i.o. and undisputed. the vs. has now regulated the following quantity: 52,500 gross repurchase value approx. 45,000 net WITHOUT VAT ./. 30K scrap car offer therefore about 15K have now read at the adac that the VAT. when obtaining an equal or higher value replacement value my lawyer does not necessarily mean. seems that I did not get the lawyer as and please ask the expert for clarification here. likewise, I would not have a right to pay for the compensation for use and the reduction in value for fictitious invoices. can’t be that 16% VAT on a difference taxed fzg to calculate and deduct. oh yes accident car ran privately and privately paid- so not about the company, no leasing car etc. I am grateful for every input. gruss dig