Hello guys, I have a problem with which you might be able to help me, I suspect somewhere a misunderstanding: I had an accident 6 years ago with a car (Kadett Flieheck 4door 90PS) which was insured with my “home insurance”, the insurance family had SF 17 and ran to 35%. Shortly after that I changed the vehicle, on a box van (Kadett Combo 54PS) which I could not insure with my insurance because they did not insure trucks. This fin g then again with SF1 and ran on 40%, for 1 year even on 35, why always? Anyway, I have sold it again now and am with a car (Passat Variant 90PS) again with my actual insurance, with the other insurance was the stand SF6 and 40%, but my current contract stands on SF6 with 55%. My father who actually regulates this with the insurances, since it also runs on mother’s name, let itself be fed with the reason that it is a UN case. It can’t be that I paid 150€ less for a “truck” which is usually well above a Passat combi … In addition, we get a bunch of Rabbatte with our current insurance, since almost everything is insured with them and my parents are in the public service, Vattern even as an official. Before I can get a job, I’m not sure if I can get a job. I wanted to deal with the insurance again I wanted to ask here if all this has its correctness, somewhere there must have occurred an error. If I had known that I would have stayed with the other insurance or had bought me a box van again. Something like that can really annoy you, especially because as a student you are dependent on every euro. Greeting gap