Hello everywhere! Maybe jehmand can help me from you and knows a good advice for me! Before a few weeks I drove with my golf 3 return value and caused an accident! when driving back, I drove against a bollard and tree (not straight slow and unbraked, since I slipped from the clutch while stepping clutch and pasted everything in within wound fracture parts). luckily I had a full cash insurance on my car! car is total damage 97Bj. now I have to find out that the insurance apparently does not want to settle the damage! quote of the insurance: our investigations have not been completed we have requested the file from the fine office in magdeburg, whether you have insurance protection we can not say now. have received 5 days ago post from magdeburg (fine) and had to pay 35 euro(reason: in return driving lack of care and a foreign thing damaged) I have with my w now the question arises me why I have a full cascade (exactly from these foundations, if I have a mishaps and I drive my car kaput, which I am insured for such cases). why does the insurance say that you first have to check whether I have insurance cover or not, if I am fully cascade insured! the whole game with the insurance goes for 3 months! can one of you give me a good advice od he has experienced something like this before??? I don’t want to turn on a lawyer because I have to pay him out of my own pocket and it’s about a damage sum of 5000 euro!
Author: 00c12f
-
Innocent and now also the bill??
In June last year, I was supposed to have damaged another car with my partner’s car when I parked out on a commercial site. The next day, the insurance company already called us: unsuspecting. One day later, two policemen appeared who wanted to look at the “car”. I let them grant – they didn’t find anything… My lawyer received a suspension of the proceedings against payment of €300 to the Justitzkasse. I responded because I had no driving licence. (in the event of an accident, withdrawal) is incapacitated. I believed that this thing was now out of the world… (30€ Justice + 500€ lawyer) … First of all, my partner was ranked higher- I have seen that somehow- the damage was there- even if I did not cause it- the insurance paid him… But came a few days ago a letter from the insurance company (name edited) that they had to provide the services they had under the compulsory insurance law I have not done everything that can be used to clarify the facts (point E.1.3. ABB). Therefore, the insurance according to point E.5.1 ABB is free of performance. I have had a driving licence since 1992 and have since been without any damage to anyone – and I am a frequent driver with more than 40000 km/year 1. I wonder to what extent the right thing is AND If insured dan n please not with the *piiiiep*. Because as you can see here, they also profit from a damage. It is also nice, that if I want to have a installment payment, then I have to give up the right of the objection and sign a declaration of guilt – i.e. even if I successfully get the money again… No matter whether you believe me, that I was not (with the accident) or not- with these business transactions I can only get before the *piiiiep* car insurance Does anyone know how far it is lawful to claim back the money from me??? Thank you ***Company name edited by MartinSHL
-
Now let’s finally pick up my SLK!
Slowly I get really envious. Everywhere in the Mercedes forum I have to read that someone has picked up his car again. Not that I’m not happy for the pick-up, but if it’s only about 4-6 weeks as with me (built in the 3rd decade of July, delivery in early August) I’m getting a bit impatient. Especially in the nice weather right now! Here’s my car (pictures are available on the day of collection!): VEHICLE: Model : SLK 200 Compressor Painting : Palladiumsilver P Oiling : Leather Upholstery colour: Alpakagrey SPECIAL EQUIPMENT: 386 Comfort Telephony 403 AIRSCARF (additional heating in the headrest) incl. wind bulkhead made of fabric FA floor mats (carpet) received as accessory. 580 Air conditioning THERMATICK 518 Media Interface 477 Tire pressure loss warning 875 windscreen washing system heated 345 windscreen wiper with rain sensor 873 seat heating front seats 726 pre-fitting carrier system 614 bi-xenon headlights m. cleaning system, dyn. light width regulation 213 direct steering 249 Interior/outside mirror autom. dimmable, exterior mirror left and right electr. foldable 876 interior light package R95 Light alloy wheels, 4x 5-double spoke design 220 Parktronic system (PTS) 486 sports suspension 260 absence type identification mark on rear cover 283 wind lock transparent 3-part 510 Radio Audio 20 CD m. integrated 6-part CD changer Coloured something else, how do you like it?
-
THE summer is here…Show me what you have ;D
Too bad you can upload only one… hilarious !!! Here’s mine from the FRONT … the stern is too sexy
-
Winter tire SLK 171 or prefer a simple winter car ??
Hello friends, the next winter is at the door and so slowly I have to think about the “winter shoes” of our SLK ́s. How do you see the thing: Alu ́s with winter tires for tens of thousands or better a small winter car for small money?? Had so far only front-wheelers and with them it went through the winter great. Note: live in the top north of Westphalia, where snowfall will soon be in the lexicon. ( last year you just 5 white days)
-
SLK 200 K – per and counter
To all SLK 200 K – W 170 drivers or those who have an opinion about it! I find the car simply beautiful and it is a lot of fun. So my dream car, because as BJ 2001 also affordable for me. Now stands with a dealer near me this car. BJ 3/2001, so Nachmopf, scarz, red/black leather seats, switch, 70,000 km, 15,000 €. I would like to exchange my A-Class ( A 170 Diesel, BJ 8 / 2001, price approx. 6400 € ) against the SLK. But I drive about 30,000km per year. We ( 2 persons) n The cost of gas is about twice as high as that of my A-Class. I don’t think the other operating costs are soooo much. What would you do. Thank you for your opinion! Cioa Jörg
-
Can’t decide – SLK, MG or Z3?
Hall oils, although I bought a Mondeo only about 6 months ago, I think at the moment (could it be the weather?) about the purchase of a convertible. I already had a SLK 200 BJ 1999. At that time still without a compressor. Was nice, but somehow lacked some speed. Now I had also thought about whether an MG or a Z3 could be an alternative. The MG of the price very interesting, but just a little small. The problem of the fabric cover has the Z3 also, all However, the Z3 3 has a better processing, as far as I can judge. Now you read a lot of things, but somehow make me insecure. At the SLK the models 2001-2002 with approx. 70-90.000 km would be in question, because they are still OK. Must it necessarily be the 320er or the 200 compressor is enough? What about problems at that age. My old A4 Tdi only emptyed the cash register from 160,000. Can one roughly transfer that? What should I still pay attention to? Greetings