Author: 00c12f

Since I haven’t had the opportunity to drive all the cars, my question is primarily addressed to the users who have already enjoyed it. It’s about: Nissan 200 SX S14 Honda S 2000 BMW Z3 3.0 The setup is deliberately chosen. Turbo, high-speed engine and vacuum cleaner with a lot of engine capacity. That the BMW has the cleanest power development, from below already provides good power, that’s clear to me. The Nissan won’t respond so spontaneously to gas commands and a not so wide But I think with the right concept it can all be tempting. The important question is: Which of the vehicles is the most fun in your opinion? Where is the handling the sharpest and most fun – and where is the combination of engine and handling a guarantee for lasting driving pleasure? Because a too “straight” car can’t be long at some point. I think a car has to have character, corners and edges… but that’s why I’m aware of the comparison to the Z3. I haven’t driven it yet – I don’t know how strong the car is. On the old engine vision track test, the BMW was already significantly faster than the Honda. But can you measure driving fun in lap times? That’s probably also questionable! The new Subaru BRZ is also significantly slower in lap times than some “competitions”, has against F rontkratzer like the Renault Megane RS or against a VW Scirocco clearly lost. But the motor journalists seem enthusiastic about the driving fun that the vehicle offers. I look forward to your comments

Hello and good morning to each other, I don’t think I’m the first one to seek your help on this topic, but maybe you can help me find something because I have no idea. I’m looking for a small car here my requirements: Size: ca: Golf I – Golf III (compact) Year of construction: everything from 2000 Manufacturer: not France or Italy (bad experiences), like Japan Cost: likes only 2000-3000eur, but up to 8k is air engine: petrol or diesel, 70hp-100hp is enough. : Climate, ABS, servo, electric disc lifter front, like without ESP etc., more than 2 airbags unnecessary, like with Navioption, no elktr. adjustable seats etc. (this just weighs too much) Weight: as low as possible, preferably less than 900kg (is that still possible?) With the desired equipment it is enough if this was offered at all with a vehicle. I look for the car myself when I first know what I’m looking for. At the moment I drive a Mitsubishi Carisma BJ. 97. That’s ok. but for the daily work way too big and too heavy. Nevertheless he consumes partly under 6l/100km (1,6l petrol, 90hp). Thanks already for your help! Greetings, Paul