Author: 00c12f

Hello, it doesn’t really belong here but… I bought a used Golf IV 4 years ago with VW used car warranty and it always extended by one year in June. Last year, so June 2010, I filled out the application as usual and brought it to the car dealership. The responsible employee told me that everything was done for me. About 4 weeks later, I didn’t get a policy and no money was debited. I called there, and they told me that VW zz. is not going to follow. After 2 months the same game again, this time with the reason that you can’t explain it either. The same after the 3rd and 4th call… At some point I left it with the calls and trusted that the insurance was extended. So now it came as it had to come. I was in the workshop today and had to have a few repetitions for the TÜV, so about 800 euros. All material and work The nice employee told me that he can still remember the 4 conversations in total but could not tell me anything more about the extension of my insurance today. He would then contact me again tomorrow. What do you think about it, do I change that the insurance company will take over the repairs? Greetings

I’d like to have a problem. Here’s what I’ve done backwards with an AHK to touch another car. Number plate depleted, grilled a strut pressed and minimal paint off the bumper. Everything no problem and I’ll pay too. I’m also aware that the painting costs a bit and I’m also willing to pay a complete painting. Problem: Have a quote now. There’s the bumper also on it. And it has nothing. Besides the missing paint. yes I can judge. I can run the whole thing over the insurance course (and buy back) and try to reject the unfounded claims. I also had the damage reported precautionaryly. However, the required amount is not really high – a total of 700 € incl. VAT. (only around the bumper me too high) and I think the insurance will go the way of least resistance and pay. What do you do?

Hello everyone, I came across this forum via Google and have the hope that I will find help here. The following situation: I had a self-indebted (no intentional or gross negligence) car accident with my Audi A4. Now the question of insurance arises. An expert of the insurance was already there and looked at the car. He called me today and told me the following: Repair costs approx. 3.700 € Repurchase value: approx. 3.400 € => wirtsch A residual value of the vehicle is not (yet) known to me, since everything was only done by telephone. Now I get probably only the difference amount replacement value minus residual value. Right so far? So with a fictitious residual value of 2,000 € I get “only” 1.400 €. My problem: I want to drive my dear car absolutely further, because the damages are also only purely optical. I have searched the Internet and read that the insurance at 6-months This means that after 6 months at the latest I would have to be transferred another 2,000 €. Is this true or did I confuse several things??? As an insurance layman it is quite difficult to keep track of the situation. So simply asked: If I want to continue driving my car unrepaired (because it is not necessary for road safety) (at least 6 months), I go like before to get the greatest possible amount of insurance? Many thanks for the answers.

Servus, since I am now the lucky owner of a new used car (BMW), I have of course changed the insurance. I want to take over the insurance SFK of the old (Mondeo) because I want to sell the car. Now on Friday I approved the BMW with the new insurer, the Mondeo should remain approved until the sale for test drive, according to my new insurer up to 3 weeks no problem. Since the TÜV is due for the Mondeo, I am on Saturday then to the KÜS The windscreen is defective, several small stone blows. The examiner does not give me a badge, should first let the disc be fixed. Now my question: Can I still calculate the disk repair on the old insurance (which is not yet terminated or dissolved) or do I have to bite into the sour apple and pay myself? Side question (interest me only): Can I then cancel an insurance after repair? (doesn’t come into question for me there I want to sell the car) Thank you very much

Hello, I had a non-inflicted accident. The expert had estimated the remaining value at 6000 €, but I got rid of the car for 6400 €. Now the opposing insurance wants to see the vehicle, I told them that I sold the vehicle, but since the vehicle letter is still with the bank, the disintegration of the opinion that the purchase contract is not valid, but I have a contract in writing with the buyer, where the letter is submitted My question: can the insurance simply say that the contract of sale has not come to an end and do they have the right to examine the goods, although an expert has already done so? Thank you very much already.