Author: 00c12f

https://www.t-online.de/…/…-hack-wann-pays-die-versicherung-.html In the negotiated case, valuables had been stolen from the parked vehicle. Because there were no burglary traces, the owner assumed a so-called “relay attack” in which criminals disrupt the signal of the radio key when closing or intercepting it and use it to open the vehicle. The court found another argument: for the different treatment of “relay attacks”, their difficult verifiability is also spoken of. Unlike the violent break-up, they do not cause any traces. The demarcation to a simple forgetting of the conclusion is much more uncertain and hardly comprehensible for the insurance company. (Acts: 274 C 7752/19)

I was a novice driver and up to now 2 years with the Württembergian with a telematics tariff and am now at the SF 2. Now I had sold my car and now I want to lay me a new one. The question is now: Which insurance is the best/cheapest? Which are you and why? Does someone have experience with the HUK and the telematics tariff? (I am a bit skeptical because the HUK builds a sensor in my car and at the Württembergian I had only one app on my mobile phone) Knock it off!

Hello, can an accident analysis report based on photos of the damage points to the car (light tracks) and the accident site (counter traffic at construction site) make a statement, who had driven at the moment of contact of the two vehicles and who stood? Both grinding tracks have on the mirrors and at the rear side. I see there no difference or how one can detect movement and standstill. Because of the high evaluation costs and the risk, the E Rfahrung von anderen. Hergang: In the encounter traffic on my lane there was contact with the accident opponent. The opponent drove on my track because of about 30 m long construction site on his side, although I had already left 24 meters of the area behind me and he could have waited without further delay. I braked, he too. He gave me to understand that I should avoid on the sidewalk (high curb edge). After I stopped, he tried to get past me. e he me. Now he turns the thing around and claims (like his two passengers in the car) that I had driven and had striped him.

Hello, I ran a deer a few days ago in front of my Ford Fiesta (partial cascade), nothing wild only a minor damage (front bumper, bonnet, headlights etc.) on my car. Before that was actually my first “accident”, which is why I am currently a little overburdened. I reported the damage to the insurance and am the next day in a Ford contract workshop to have a cost estimate (KVA) created. According to KVA repair costs amount to almost 4000€ (vehicle) The next day the insurance company sent by an expert who also examined the car in the undistorted condition. Yesterday I received the expert report and the expert set the repair costs at almost 250€, so that we have a difference of 1500€. I compared the expert report with the KVA and the difference arises from various points: -Various settlement prices -A part was not mentioned by the expert in the expert report, w However, even the workshop was declared as a defect and should be replaced -In the report no costs for shipment of spare parts (e.g. drive to the paintr) or disposal costs were calculated How do I proceed now? I want the vehicle repaired and no fictitious billing.