Author: 00c12f

laaaaaaange history which is almost to cry is briefly summarized: front character is 2 row as with a moped, NO us character but just a “cake plate” which is mounted side to right on the vehicle. so stop: http://www.porno-karre.com/mediapool/72/727108/resources/7308185.jpg and JA das ding is 300mm vom Boden weg and also in an angle of 30 degrees readable. 1) control mai 2009 -> defect card due to “mark not properly mounted”. fault card at the tuv have stamped with the noted “mark placed to the right according to applicable guidelines” (to be proved with pictures) and given in due time. no “aftershocks”… 2) check juli 2009 -> even official…quotation “I know you, and you still drive so around” -> display. because of what knew the self net! 3) august 2009 -> fine notice because of a not properly mounted character. quote “since you have already noticed in May 2009 because of this delict acted sentence -> 15 taler in die staatskasse. to this day NO answer. from when does the fun expire? only to the conclusion: I don’t go around the 15th, I’m talking about that I find such a ridiculous. within the time limit appeal filed with 2 side reasons (e.g. the inscante fault card from the first time and an opinion of the tüv examiner)….

Hello, I know this is once again a case where you can only shake your head. I sold a horse truck registered in May 2010. I also made a purchase contract. The buyer also gives me an extremely serious impression. But since I had a lot to worry about, I didn’t take care of it any further and I assumed that the truck was also immediately re-registered. Yesterday the tax office booked off the taxes again. Then I am directly at risk to the buyer. See that the truck was standing there, and was still registered on me. The face color swarms very quickly on when he registered who had ringed there. From the conversation then came out that he wanted to sell the truck again. I then offered him to buy the truck back, minus the insurance and taxes that I had already paid. I found this more than fair. The buyer also agreed, but called me today and said that he did not do that. n wants, unless I’m ready to add 300,-euro! I told him that it’s pure coming from me, and I find it an impudence that he is now pushing up the price after my very kulant offer! I know that I have to report the whole thing to the road traffic office. My question is now whether I can still show the buyer because of fraud/insurance/tax evasion or whatever? Thank you for your answers….

Hello together, I have a question regarding a sale of dealers to dealers. The dealers do not have to / want to give a guarantee among each other. So we take the example now: dealer 1 sells to dealer 2 a car without warranty etc. but a purchase contract is made of course. (in which also all data / conversions / etc. are recorded) If now turns out that the car for example has a different engine installed or does not have the performance in the purchase contract g! Let’s take an example of an Audi 1.9 TDI with 130 hp as a sales car, but afterwards it turns out that only a 115 hp machine is installed, because it has been exchanged for some reasons. Can one then legally approach the dealer or have no chance?

Hi everybody, I’m probably wrong here, but I didn’t find a suitable subforum for my question. I still hope that there are some people around with a clue who could be to clarify a dispute. So my husband was on the way yesterday with my car, when he came home he told me full of pride that he drove according to Tacho 310km/h. Since I know my car I asked him which slope he flew down, because at 290 km/h real 285 km/h is actually the end. He only said: No straight track, but with tailwind. Then I broke out in sounding laughter – how could my husband only use this strunting stupid tailwind argumentation, which one reads again and again in forums? – In any case, I then first enlightened the normal wind are not very fast, hurricanes catch already at 120km/h and at a speed beyond the 250km/h he would have had to chased already from a tornado of the level F4 or F5 In any case, he remained stubborn (probably as a defiant reaction because I laughed at him) and continued to claim that one achieves a higher speed when the wind blows in the direction of driving than when it is still. I then admitted to him for the sake, “Well, maybe you get out 2-3 km/h due to the lower air resistance, but no 20km/h which really reached 310km/h, but not by “backwind”. The end of the story was that he slept on the couch and even this morning he was caught at breakfast. Therefore the question to the experts: Is the claim tailwind, from a certain speed total nonsense (as I mean)? Or can it be that by the lower air resistance speeds of over 20km/h compared to the normal final speed be reached?

Hello everyone! I hope you can answer me directly to my case because I have found nothing suitable on the Internet so far. I was flashed outside (motorway). Now a write has come to my dad (the holder of the vehicle). Tolerance has been deducted, so I drove 41 km/h too fast. My dad was as a passenger with us because we wanted to change the 700km long distance with the ride. There is still nothing indicated because of punishment or something. It is only a toos My dad would want to take the whole thing, now I want to ask if something like that would be possible at all? He could possibly make use of this refusal of testimony because I am his daughter, but that also does not make much sense, because in the photo it is a younger and female person who drives. They would surely follow the photo as I read it. Does it bring something to write about the fact that he does not have the right but would still give the information because of me?! Thanks already in advance.