Category: Sagt’s uns! Forum

Hello together, since the annoying JavaScript error is extremely annoying to me and therefore MT makes very little fun, I decided to open this thread. Here all JavaScript errors come in, which are promoted when looking from MT to day. Some errors cannot be corrected by the MT workshop itself, because these are caused by foreign scripts. However, then MT should inform the scriptwriters or do not allow such scripts anymore. Quotation: Zugri ff deniedwww.motor-talk.de/forum/aktion/PostJump.html?postId=33107282 Line 4765 characters 21

Hello! On my Galaxy S4 I use the Chrome browser in the latest version 35.0.1916.141. However, the following problem already occurred with the previous version. If I want to visit www.motor-talk.de, I get the message “This website has a redirection.” The page is not loaded any further. The further error test: “The website at http://www.motor-tak.de has created too many redirections. The deletion of your cookies for this website or the permission of Drit If this is not the case, there may be a server configuration error and no problem with your device. Error code: ERR_TOO_MANY_REDIRECTS” Delete cookies has not led to success. With the default browser of the S4 with T-Mobile branding (no idea what it is then) it works without any problems. I would actually like to stay with Chrome. Does jmd. have an idea? Many greetings andy

Hello MT, may I ask quite naively, what is this again for a “useful” function? Do I see that correctly, that you not logged in users with intention throw out of the article, because he has to log in or register? In the attached screenshot I can not read the comment of @Mann19 (in the logged out state) because the software throws me out by JavaScript before. Are you already so fixed on the blank user numbers that one such a “freak” function Is it necessary to install it?

Hello together I’ve noticed more and more that more and more people are posting several answers in the same threat in a row. That’s very confusing. My idea would be to set up a lock, that you can only post in the same threat every 60 minutes, for example, until someone else has written a reply in the meantime. This would require people to use the edit button. That would make the clarity of the forum enormous. I think better.

http://www.motor-talk.de/…/tempolimit-t5977885.html?… Is a discussion about a speed limit on motorways on motor-talk prohibited? If not: how do you have to create a thread about it that is not closed? At least now I have the exhilarating (and at the same time disturbing) realization that even a limit of 250 should be discussed away. In the next thread I would like to try out 300 and see if there are still trolls that, on the other hand, do not What to have.

Sorry for the drastic expression, but it has to be said. As in most cases, this MT function totally fails. If I enter in the U.S. Car Forum in the SuFu the following: “Experiences with OSCW in Weinstadt”, or “Old School Custom Works” appears: NOTHING! OSCW is really one of the first addresses for US Cars and Oldies in Germany, and in the MT-SuFu there is nothing to find about this??? A real poverty certificate!

Hello together unfortunately has to address a not quite so pleasant topic and give me a little air Will the forum participants here a little sensitive with private business over MT. The partly family atmosphere that prevails here at MT, sometimes disguises the view and sometimes causes a certain naivety to arise. I think meanwhile, that you should be really very sure with whom one goes into business or whether one should enter it at all. Background of my “Fin gerzeigs” is that I bought a radio from a certain user a few weeks ago. now after the money was transferred, the radio came. As far as so normal, I thought to myself. Oh no, not quite. It came completely without accessories (except cable) , operating instructions , warranty certificate , invoice ???, not even the packaging there was! although the radio should be almost new. First moods made themselves wide , but well the part should finally be installed and run I thought to myself. the second: radio doesn’t work, display is dead. Starting with the Hifi man who attested to me a short and scarce “waste”. I still tried to install it in other cars ( Golf4 , polo 6n , ) , but as with my g3 nix except dead pants. The seller came across a prayer mill-like repeating “but it did not work ” out. Of course it also does not take back , everything worked wonderful … Courage is probably not all a concept. Money away , scrap as well I now had this “corrosive ebay feeling”, which you might have had before. If the seller reacted to questions already with evasive maneuvers and so on… Well, I have set up the PN contact with the user meanwhile, because he could not or wanted to give me an answer to the simplest questions. In the opposite part I was even threatened promptly with lawyer, if I bring the topic to the discussion. Conclusion: I want to have nothing to do with such people. I have my own Teaching money paid and will no longer enter into business with me rel. unknown users. Should everyone draw their own conclusions from such a thing. Greetz, thank you for reading

WO has the post disappeared because of the war on mscardesign?!

Hello, I have to say here that I find it relatively stupid that the individual moderators here are allowed to use their rights in every forum! Every now and then there are completely “foreign” moderators in any forums and do something. I would like to mention two examples that concern me myself: – a mod from the VW Forum comes into the BMW Forum and simply closes a thread. He was not even involved in the thread. – a mod from the Opel Forum has joined the TT Forum in one post The OPEL mod then threw the TT user SOFORT out of the forum without warning! The user COMPETITION was never noticed negatively! In the opposite part! Technically and humanly absolutely in order! I think that should not be! It would be more useful to make the COMPETENT mod aware of it! They usually also know the affected users better and maybe even wrote in the affected threads. That’s what I wanted to say here.

Hello There were discussions with the presenter dieselschraube in September in the W210 forum. I was very excited in the W210 forum and in this forum that whole threads were simply deleted. The coronation culminated in the fact that I was warned by dieselschraube without stating any reasons. The publication of the warning (was a standard – PN) brought me a lot of anger and discussion with other mod’s and users. I was then approached, me do So I wrote to thisselschrauber on 18.10.2004 and then again on 24.10.2004 a PN with the request to explain to me, whereby I should have used “injurious or provocative expressions”. So, now I have been waiting for a reply for months – nothing. I find this ignorance a groundless impudence. I already asked thisselschrauber on 17.09.2004 in a message to explain the warning to me. And then I found this ignorance a groundless impudence. still written as above 2 times per PN. And zero reaction. @dieselschraube I hereby ask you to answer me again !!!!!!!!!. It is very worrying that you don’t even have the Ars.. in your pants to explain this to me. I mean, you had more than enough time to do it. Or did you think that the topic is done for me? According to the motto time to the country – weed over – warning? na and – finished. Harald