Category: Sagt’s uns! Forum

Moin! There is something about the subforums that irritates me here. No, not the subforums themselves. They are a good idea. But why can you still write in the “Grundforen” if subforums exist? For example, there is an “Audi A3 & S3 Forum”. There are subforums for the old “A3 8L”, and one for the newer “A3 8P & 8PA”. So far it makes sense. Only there are still many users who can’t decide whether to drive an old or new A3. And garbage The basic forum (“Audi A3 & S3 Forum” with their questions too. In the golf forum just like that. For each golf there is a subforum (at Golf VI even with sub-sub-forum). Nevertheless, almost every day someone writes directly under “Golf”. As if it were so difficult to post directly to the right model. And in ten other MT forums it is certainly just like that.. My question (or better please) to the mods: there is a reason why in these forums despite many suitable sub-forums still new Thr And don’t you even want to change that because of clarity?

“I don’t know if you already knew …” … but the display of the page number of a thread in the overview of a subforum has been broken since today. For example, in the VW engine subforum the “Which engine oil?” thread is only the “6” instead of the correct number “1.606”. And if I go there with the mouse pointer, for example, to jump directly to the last post, only a blank, single-line field pops up. Nice greeting Edit: This seems to be the same in all other VW subforums. u be, just not here in the “Say Us” subforum …

For our sleeping moderators and administrators – the forentroll “Pnesi” is taking apart the biker-treff and brings up all threads from 2002 from the sinking. Please banish immediately!!!!!!!!

Question: “Mercedes Linguatronic retrofitting possible?” Answer: “Yes, but is not worth it. Is very expensive.” or “Go to the MB workshop, they can certainly help you.” or: “Why aren’t you looking for in the forum?”Question: “Search part number for …. . Who can help me.” Answer: “The friendly ones can certainly help you.” or “This question has been asked many times.” Age ne! With such unproductive, less-mediated answers I get loud pustules on my forehead! Do you think he hasn’t tried it yet? Do you think he doesn’t know that there is a workshop? And if people want to get an opinion, then the word “opinion” is also written in the title. In this forum you should help each other, even if one has not looked well enough. One should also understand that one has to research in part, like a detective, precisely because so many insignificant K ommentare, which restrict the search strongly. In the topics in which I have searched, usually only a contribution of 5 to 10 is usable. How can you find something?

Ahoi Wanted to ask why you can’t delete your blog? Wouldn’t it be good if you can do this, because I have prescribed me >. < now I can't change it anymore. Have written to moderators and an admin but no response Love greetings

In the Kaufberatungsforum there are a few things that are “slowly” annoying: 1. When tips are repeated, block waiters come around the corner and spam the thread with criticism:http://www.motor-talk.de/…/…-or-doch-vw-golf-7-t5890736.html?… You would have to explain to them that the Kaufberatungsforum is NOT designed in such a way that each threader performs a search before creating a thread, whether his wishes have been discussed before. But everyone creates his own thread, because s owieso everyone has a very own driving profile and own requirements, you can not generalize that. One wants a diesel because of 30,000 kilometers per year, the next one a petrol with > x hp, the next one a hybrid because of the reliability; the budget is different etc… So if someone repeats tips, this is just as normal as a newly created thread, which is very similar to an existing thread. You can criticize tips just as repeatedly in terms of content, but if you do 2. The dogma “it must not be suggested any other models than the ones mentioned by the thread maker, if he has committed himself to it” (in my opinion senseless) is already contained in the purchase advice fora rules in the sticky thread. It can’t hurt to take the blindfolds away from a thread maker. He can still say no. Can this be changed please? The Blockwart behavior There is also this (see also the linked thread) and this is also spam. 3. If a moderator (without red names, i.e. as a normal user, but for everyone who is able to read, is clearly recognizable as e.g. the moderator of the forum just called, because its user name is now like this…) as a normal discussion participant, he should be allowed to use a different account (as an exception to the terms of use). I ran behind like a sheep herd in my opinion and if it then, for example, lowers the opinion of a user, it does not work at all (the latter I do not know from any other serious forum). A moderator should remain neutral and only intervene moderatingly if the terms of use have been violated.

Suggestions that are posted here in the “Sagts uns” area of M-T users should only be answered by M-T decision-makers. By this I mean M-T employees can implement the ideas (enforce) or justify their rejection. That would save many useless discussions and advance the “shop”. Always recurring “yes” and “that’s not possible” and “I can’t decide that sowiso” ect. Comments quench the enlightened spirit of innovative users only unnecessary. ße MC

Hello people I have just seen by chance that the popular “google analytics” is also used here on “Motor-Talk”. As a normal user I would have with the collection of my personal data and transferred to “google” to evaluate and further process less problems, but still consider it a pity to find here no indication of such behavior. Especially since we do not know exactly what is done with my data in the end. I am also not an advocate of too strict data protection regulations. Only a consideration between the need to evaluate operators of websites and the increased interest of users in data protection should not be neglected. I would like to receive an opinion from anministrative page here. Greeting Freddykl

Hello workshop, that you have an input field right at the end of each thread to be able to answer directly, is very comfortable. In fact, I start typing my answer there in about 90% of the cases. However, I turn again in maybe 50% of the cases to the “extended editor”, because with the simple editor simply the complete toolbar is missing I want to insert a link or format text more often. Of course, you can also do this by using the tags typed by hand, but that’s not really meaning of the thing and above all error-prone, so that you have to correct the post in the end after all (in the extended editor). What’s against simply showing the extended editor or at least the editor toolbar for inserting the tags directly in the thread? The simple editor in the current form is simply too primitive and the subsequent change to the extended editor is annoying, because then one always there first about the yellow Message must restore the text (which in about 1% of cases is not clappy, very annoying!).

Hello MT municipality, I just came home and read the newsletter of MT. It contains a new section called “actions” The first action now starts directly with motorcheckup, which can be obtained here cheaply. Now surely some will say that MT exaggerates the advertising. Only recently the large ad with the insurance, where there was already isolated protest. Recently the protest about spam-like mails because of alleged Golf VI advertising. Now again concretely a product is in the front rgrund and it will sound right again, that advertising came by mail. But I don’t want to complain about it here. I say that here has been addressed to user requests. So what has happened is what users want. Concretely HERE It’s great when MT implements proposals. That’s what I wanted to say. And now I wish everyone a nice weekend.