Category: Sagt’s uns! Forum

On the one hand, because the NoS time for the manufacturers is no longer just one of many lap times and it is up and running, the mother of all the comparison values, the 0-100km/h time to displace from its top position, on the other hand, because this time also seems to be more and more interested in a large number of users from all brand areas here in the forum. However, since it is currently in appropriate, cross-branded Ge The most recent NoS times, as usual, will be published in the Porsche Forum until now. Although this is in a certain way annoyed by the Zuffis per se, the drivers and fans of this brand are becoming more and more annoying. Logically, many will now say, of course, it’s annoying when virtually every new release drives around the ears of the common Porsche on the NoS … well, unfortunately, I have to act in a corrective way. Even if this may now seem appreciable, especially the 0815-Porschefahrer is much less oriented towards such naked performance figures than some other car enthusiasts. Why else would he spend so much money to get the performance that – somewhere else – there would be in equal or even higher proportion also half of the price (but, of course, you know that as a Porsche driver, even if we may seem a little brazen in our boxes, we are not quite that stupid then … ). All those for whom the NoS time represents the measure of all comparable things will provide enough traffic. All those who pass these numbers simply by the very best, can devote themselves in their brand forums to the advantages which they have finally moved to purchase their device. This includes, in the very last case, the successful because fastest possible completion of the journey on the most famous race track in the world. Sal ut Alfan PS. This is not supposed to mean that in the future you can no longer compare fast devices with GT2 and consorts – also, or especially in the P-Forum – that is not the case, only it would be right to make sure that the P-Forum does not become the melting pot of all the collected comparative values of all existing brands on any race track in the world.

Fuck the warning I got here, but that you would do your work here, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no.

Hello dear Mod`s me is annoyed that in all forums the headlines are either not very meaningful or completely wrongly written. Then it is not surprising if several similar threads are opened. Can not even sit down a mod and correct the headlines, e.g. possible in possible It would be nice if you could correct your title yourself. P.S. Why are threads closed and then remain visible??? That doesn’t make any sense! cher are then edited left then a hull thread to which one can then no longer refer.

Hello! SpyGe just got me the idea to open a thread for your wishes and suggestions for improvement to the blogs. I start with my wishes. I wish: – Editing and deletion without time limit – I don’t think the background white is very nice and somehow not suitable for MT. Suggestions: 1.: You take the usual MT blue and for delimitation (it is desired from above) a different color frame 2.: The blog author can get the colors of Hint I don’t think that’s all I can think of right now, but I’m sure there’s something else coming from me. But now you’re on the move. MfG Meehster

Moin. With the 1-word titles in the Golf3 range it has got better, but not very much. I haven’t seen any messages from the mods, nor have any corrections. On the first three pages I counted 10 1-word titles. I know Mods have family, friends, private life. I only have my parents in the house, siblings have moved out, no family etc. and I am eig. outside my working hours always online at M-T… We ham in the G3 range already 8 mods, but they selt I think that’s just a statement. But even with “Biete Volkswagen” it’s not better. There are always (!!) topics with links to eBay pages by users or to eBay articles by users, although we have an extra category for that. Even there hardly any steps in there. I mean, I’m not the order lover or something… I just hate this “1 word title” on the one hand, where you have to interpret what’s coming (and the leude usually expect a help, eig. you have to make me taste their problem and not the other way around), on the other hand, if you browse the Bite VW and find “part collections” (where I always search in the Krimskrams) and then only an uncommented eBay link as here shows up, you get this in the long run. Do I exaggerate? Or what do you say?

In recent times, I have noticed more and more that topics appear in the forums, which in my opinion do not belong there at all, but which can also be due to the fact that the mod’s don’t want to be very careful… or can, after all, is summer time = holiday time… What I want to say is the following, I think that the board community still lacks a forum for its non-vehicle-bound interests, because the “Tell us!” is only a little suitable for this and I understand, for example, it meh r as the right point for suggestions and similar. I could imagine a kind of “off-topic” forum like you know it from many other boards, then the Leutz can talk about pretty much everything that doesn’t have its own forum! With it you two probatives get out of the way, on the one hand, where to place with contributions that are not really to be arranged, and on the other hand you can promote the cohesion of the users among themselves. In that they then build up more “private” contact, and keep up The whole thing is just such an idea that I prefer, because it works well in many other small and large forums…

Hello MT, Hello municipality briefly and briefly I describe my problem: if I want to create a blog “With picture and text” I can upload pictures at the first blog editing, which I can then of course also sort in a certain row fly, etc. Now I wanted to leave my blog invisibly for other readers to insert pictures afterwards. The problem, however, is that I can no longer upload images, or not with the options, which I already mentioned above. I only have the possibility to create attachments. MfG

Hello, I think, by now about 95% of all users here need a refresher in the spelling material 1. Class primary school: “That” is not the same as “that”. The word “that” used to be “that” and has a vaguely different meaning than “that”. I have been reading almost exclusively stuff lately, in which practically no “ß” or two small ss occurs anymore or the two small s are used wrongly. At some point, it is hugely annoying if you just have to read: “.. .that’s how it is, I said yes…” “that’s awesome…” etc. If virtually every adult person doesn’t check the new spelling or has a fault in his finger and can’t press a letter twice in a row, how about just unpacking the good old “ß” again? Always better and more understandable than this invasion of the incomprehensible letters.

Since June 2007 my signum has a DPF of the company GAT. advertised and installed with car part Unger. 1. Has already someone experience with regress requirements towards ATU. How should I/we proceed – in writing is clear – RA as last help too! Perhaps there are already sample letters or sample lawsuits. Including the refund of the additional expenses (working time, registration registration, ….). 2. What happens with the HU with the not permissible DPF?? Detachment, again to the registration position e, …. new costs. 3. If there are already experiences with sogenant improvements, including the costs. 4. If someone has a list of exactly affected DPF – according to type designation – or if someone knows where it is visible. The media landscape writes a lot and nonsense. Please answer, which I want to assert my claims – experiences from this will then of course be discontinued. Your FixFax

Dear motor talk community, I would have the following suggestion to make: I would like it to be useful if you could specify in the profile the vehicle that you are driving and the place of residence. So I mean that it is displayed on the left of the posts. This would perhaps also eliminate the problem that you often don’t know which car (bj., engine, etc.) is involved in problem inquiries. As it is now, some have the information about their vehicle in the signature (like me) and some Sometimes it makes sense to know who has which vehicle. If you don’t want to specify it, you don’t have to do it. What do you think of this proposal?