Category: Sagt’s uns! Forum

Hello, since the Light Bike Forum in the “biker department” is slowly becoming the one-sided “Bastel and Tuning(Test)-Plauderecke” mostly young moped and moped riders, and as a 125 driver one is not taken seriously by all drivers of a “right” motorcycle, I would like to encourage to set up a separate column for 125 motorcycles. I believe that a “clean cut” could only do the forum good, and the number of interested users (and thus the quality of the contributions) In terms of numbers, we 125 riders are a strong group, which, for reasons like this, prefers to “dismember” other parts of the forum. One of them tries it in his “brand rubik” (if available), the other in the “biker meeting”, some in the LKR corner, and who does not feel right at home remains silent. At any rate, it would not be bad if all 125 riders could exchange ideas on a common platform, and those for us interesting contributions did not have to pick out laboriously from a huge number of topics about “burn out exhaust” and similar nonsense of the Mofa faction. Greetings Reimund

Hello @all I may have broken some taboo again or simply violated the NUB’s. At least this is how a moderator sees it. He complained about my new article and sent me the following reference: Quote: I do not share your opinion and refer to our NUB, §5.3: 5.3 You may not, as part of the use of the MOTOR-TALK.de services: “Save, publish and/or transmit data, texts, images, files, links, software or other content, which according to the relevant legal provisions, or according to the opinion of MOTOR-TALK.de […] insulting, vulgar, […] are to be objected or can cause harm to minors in any way, in particular pornographic, […]; And: “anyone, […], harass, insult, […] or embarrassment […]; Therefore please delete your blog entry or I do so. According to the comments, estimated 90% of visitors understand the irony in this article. I pe Remarkably, I don’t really see how to delete the blog article, because I don’t see any violation in relation to the NUB’s. Now I wanted to ask us if I had to delete it because I don’t see it. MfG Breaker

Hello together! With the search function I have so my dear effort: 1. AND-link? In fact it seems to be an OR-link, at least more posts are found, the more words I enter. What am I doing wrong? 2. The search result is not displayed thread-wise, so that a thread only occurs once in the search result, but with every hit in the thread, so that the thread often appears dozens of times in the search result. That makes the search work. What am I doing wrong? Can I set this somewhere? Ask for clues. Greetings, Luke

In my opinion, the motor talk starts to become a bit too fat and extensive, so that people can get lost… For example, there is a Suzuki forum, Suzuki blog, Suzuki marketplace … so it will happen to me that the Suzuki fans no longer meet directly, or the search will be too extensive… In addition, the one Suzuki can be already an oldie, offroader … or similar… Suzuki has only been taken as an example I have at some point at some point r Web-Site saw the hint that this is kept simple with intention so that every user without long search comes to the goal, that even with slow or with security-set Internet connections have fast access to the information, I found good… And motor talk is increasingly becoming more and more tinkered and playful… I want simple information and “talking” with autospinners … The criticism should not be called that all what MT does is bad, I find this brand and interests cross-sectional forum is really great.

For the sake of clarity, in order not to mix praise criticism and real errors in habu’s thread, I allow myself to open a thread in which as few posts as possible should occur so please only mark reproducible errors here. – foren as read; if you select via rollbars and *click* on the rising area the forum will be marked as read. but if you take the button “LOS” then a error box comes: no redirect implemented Harry

Hello moderators, For over 2 weeks I have been trying to get my exit from this forum. Multiple and direct contact emails are ignored, public posts on this topic are also ignored and pointed out the “official ways”. If you follow these missing recommendations, then the point again comes to use: “multiple and direct contact emails are ignored”. Do at least anything in your spare time, which you can also. Service is certainly not what m Is it better to go with your loved ones to stroll around and eat ice cream. At least you don’t annoy a whole range of users. Do I have to turn to a competent body on the topic of GDPR or does the moderator team get the few mouse clicks even so completely without an annoying assistance of a service??? Thank you and greetings

Dear Forists, currently we have the third thread in the Leasing Forum with very opaque leasing offers, which run through the company LR. The aim of their company is to win junior partners with extremely cheap leasing conditions, who then buy and sell cosmetic products (must) so that they get enough bonus points, so that the super-cheap leasing rates come about. In my view, such offers are unbearable and have lost nothing on motor talk, since there is a In addition, the care products are not even intended for the car, but for the people. What is the moderation and especially MOTOR-TALK about it? Greetings

Hello forum, read with me for quite some time. Unlike in other forums, threads are closed here arbitrarily – “for clarity”. What is clear about a monster thread?? Newbies are happy to be “swept away” by the sheriffs first. Especially “the Sentinel” likes to have an authoritarian tone. “Daniel Audifan” just nagging around his toy and will probably not have retrofitted the AMI in 10 years. “AndreeHagen” likes to stand up at night and closes up for the first time. n few threads, that makes you feel equally important.. Motor talk owner is I believe the Springer publishing house, which are mainly up-to-date. Do they know this forum? Just my 2 cents

Hallihallo, I just looked into my profile for fun and saw that my contributor probably drank one about the thirst. Supposedly I wrote a total of four posts (with this then 5), although below there are the right numbers… I would like to have my other 3,000 posts again…

Dear MT team, with what permission does MT decide to make decisions/explanations in the name of a user? I wanted to write to a (locked but unknown) user via PN, and received the message “User XXXXX does not want to receive private messages.” As I know the phone number, I called the user, who then told me that he is (temporarily) blocked, but could not be told that he does not receive messages. Certainly he can and may not receive any at the moment, but I think (also legally) that he does not want to be very concerned! Maybe someone should think about the formulation again?! Greetings Manfred