Category: Sagt’s uns! Forum

Quotation: Moin, 1.) Because this thread is about fraud in the sense of embezzlement 2.) It is about general information and not conjectures, stories from earlier and special cases.3.) Because I am the creator of the post and thus determine the rules So please keep to it … Again the request: The case is only the example and was the trigger for the question here. However, we do not have to push this here and hack on our poor moderators. Thank you.

Hello dear MT – team, I think it’s nice that MT continues to grow and you get the new members displayed on the website. Could it possibly be that a botprotection is missing when you sign up? I can’t imagine that people really want to be called that… besides, they all have either a profile image of Jimmy Neutron, Animes, Paris Hilton, Lindsey Lohan or Mike Tyson etc. And they all have great links to any kind of MT – team. Polish pages or quickly earn money on the Internet pages or Londonescortgirls etc… and corresponding tagwords. Here are a few that are currently on the homepage:http://www.motor-talk.de/…/UserDetails.html?userId=4458189http://www.motor-talk.de/…/UserDetails.html?userId=4458157http://www.motor-talk.de/…/UserDetails.html?userId=4458082http://www.motor-talk.de/…/UserDetails.html?userId=44588081http://www.motor-talk.de/…/UserDetails.html?userId=4458082http://www.moto r-talk.de/…/UserDetails.html?userId=4458076http://www.motor-talk.de/…/UserDetails.html?userId=4458067http://www.motor-talk.de/…/UserDetails.html?userId=4458065http://www.motor-talk.de/…/UserDetails.html?userId=4458039http://www.motor-talk.de/…/UserDetails.html?userId=4458043http://www.motor-talk.de/…/UserDetails.html?userId=4458039http://www.motor-talk.de/…/UserDetails.html?userId=4457965http://www.motor-Uster/De-talk.de/ tails.html?userId=4458076http://www.motor-talk.de/…/UserDetails.html?userId=4457947 If you try the user IDs in between at random, there are almost only these fake profiles in it. I think there is a need for action.

A friendly hello to the forum and the workshop, I noticed this article in the insurance forum here:http://www.motor-talk.de/…/…-auf-lkw-uebernahmen-t5955004.html?… A first contribution of the “user” VHV in the name of the VHV. If it had only arrived to the “user” VHV for a help for the local TE, he could have made the via PN halfway NUB-compliant. But that is now somewhat different in the room. This company was mentioned in the context only marginally and it was A PN of the VHV instead of a posting of the same content would certainly have helped the user as well. As it now stands it is free PR and thus marketing in the user area. If I have read this correctly in older posts, this was on MT so far a red cloth. Is this a new line of MT, to which one should adjust as a “normal” user in the sense of NUB No.2.1? The VHV is certainly not such a nuclei. tzer, since she herself is not capable of action and/or business. Only her representative bodies under company law are that and indeed as a natural person. To prejudge the question: yes, I don’t want to have such a thing in the user area. I don’t know if I am so alone with my attitude to this. That’s why I am putting this here for discussion and looking forward to factual arguments and opinions pro and contra. And now gentleman(wo)men, start your engines!

Hello workshop, I try to provide specific messages or information with @username from time to time. However, I have my doubts from time to time: once the @username is written yellow, sometimes two @users work…. in a message, then again only one, although two are in it. It makes no difference whether I write this manually or select it in the editor field. What is it about? What am I doing wrong?

I’m really shocked by the Volkswagen audience! It would be nice if the authors of the topics would report here to tell why a person can only be so nasty! http://www.motor-talk.de/t579142/f217/s/thread.htmlhttp://www.motor-talk.de/t578998/f217/s/thread.html This is neither funny, nor especially worth knowing and certainly not desired, so what is it?

When a pop-up asked me about it, I thought it would be a cool function. However, it is annoying at the moment. Not only do I get information from threads that don’t interest me at all, no even if I close the tab, the web messages are still there. Entering web message in the search function did not result in a hit. I found nothing in the cockpit (my settings) in the quick. How can I disable the annoying web messages??

Hello! Recently a new symbol appears that should point to a competition. Seen but do not want to participate… How/when does it disappear again? To click away there is nothing….

time yesterday the posted links no longer work and are constantly misguided to ??? could you take care of yourself thank you!!!!

Every time I start MT, the site has been trashed with ads for a few weeks. When I click through the individual forums, it’s not like that anymore. Looks like it’s the only forum I’m active in, the only one where I get so “disturbed”, I guess it’s the forum software that doesn’t block this, despite AddBlocker, despite registration. It’s getting annoying. Usually it should look like that.

V&S Rules of the Game, among others: “It is discussed factually about the topic opened by the threader. Who has nothing objective to contribute, leaves the fingers off the keyboard! Off-topic and spam contributions are deleted without comment, and who continues to post nonsense despite better knowledge risks a 36h lock or ultimately the banishment. This applies especially to „I’m getting popcorn!!” Moderator posts in the forum (public): “And what has this senseless waste of space? with the actual topic? Nix…” User (me) explains to the mod that the posting has to do with the topic in detail, and if he doesn’t care, he can ignore the posting after all (somewhat pointedly formulated, but after the public, personal attack – and OT – quite appropriate).And what does the mod do: “And I like to explain to you again the rules of the V&S, which are pinned at the top. However, this will not run over a PN, but quite simply and inconspicuously over a little break of 36h for your account.” …public, in the forum. I quote the game rule again: “It is objectively discussed about the topic opened by the threader. Who has nothing objective to contribute, leaves the fingers off the keyboard!” Two complete and comprehensive rule violations by the MOD – ZACK – the user should be blocked. That’s how it should work? Do the rules apply to the mod, or not? Or are MODs authorized, in case of personal non-failure a posting to publicly attack users (“senseless waste of storage space”, factually incorrect (would have nothing to do with the subject), and if the user refuses to block the user?