Category: Verkehr & Sicherheit Forum

Hello, I have a question about the first-aid kit, which must be on board every vehicle. I myself have a training as a paramedic and also offer the medical service in addition to other services in the security service commercially. For this I have put together a suitcase, which is built on the first-aid kit according to DIN 13157 (trade) (of some associations are more there, of others less) and has been extended by useful material. offer e.g. a blood pressure measuring device, a breathing bag (combibag from Weinmann), a blood glucose meter, pulse oximeter, a few splints, a Stifneck and a lot more. In the case everything you need for the first-aid is compiled according to my own experience. Now the police stopped me the other day. The gentlemen wanted to see the first-aid kit and the warning triangle among other things. The first-aid kit of the car was half empty with me because I used the things And the gentlemen did not want to recognize the suitcase as a first-aid kit. Also my reference to the §35h Abs. 4, StVZO ignored the police. After that also other first-aid material can be carried along. One of the policemen then told me that he would deal with e.g. a first-aid kit. In my suitcase he doesn’t know now, however, where there is something. (Right at this moment I thought of the joke with the doctor and the bun!) En The story was a defect card and an oral warning. Oh yes, and the things I put out of the first-aid kit, I was not allowed to put back in my first-aid kit. I wonder, however, if that is so right. I actually have tested material in the suitcase, with which you can provide first-aid, in the total value of about 600€ and that is not supposed to meet the requirements of a first-aid kit of 0815 €??

Hello municipality, it was probably treated before, but with me it is bit more complex. I was flashed with the car of an acquaintance and was 47 km/h too fast. That was on 07.05.2014. In the meantime my acquaintance repeatedly got questions and writing he should give the driver. He had always answered this with the statement he would not know anymore. Last week then came the fine notice, where you blame him. If he now shouts b if I have driven, then the statute of limitations has already occurred or applies to the matter as long as it has not yet been completed. Thanks already for your help

Hello, in December last year a policeman wanted to have watched me “tap” on the phone… was traveling with the truck.. a few weeks later I have a yellow letter in the mailbox …in which it was said: an official would have watched me tap on the phone…have taken me a lawyer..just an official- no photo-no video- a single statement… the matter goes before court appointment is the day after tomorrow…..how do you think this will end???

Hi, I know the title is confusing, but I have one. I will see a car tomorrow which the seller (private person) has already signed off on Friday. However, since I would drive the car to the Dekra for the exam, if he agrees to me, this is no longer possible by the cancellation. The seller says that he has no problems with a test, but points out that I have to bring (if possible red) registration plates with me. For example, a test drive he said that we can only do this on the premises of his grandfather or in the adjacent fields. The vehicle is an Alfa 156, year 2000, 130tkm, in which timing belt, wapu, brakes, oil change, termostat, tyres and windshield (fg. Steinschlag) have been renewed. The question in itself is now, since I am unsure whether it is still profitable to visit the vehicle at all.

Hello, what is the legal situation? I am on the motorway on the left lane with for example 120 km/h and am overtaking. Then a speed limit with 80 km/h comes. I brake slightly until I am on Tacho about 90 km/h and can not go to the right, because there is already a car with the same speed. Behind me is a car, I notice that I want to drive faster. I have to either fall back or speed up to the right side of the road. can change, or can I drive to the left of the other car without being guilty of coercion? Thank you and greeting P.S.: Such a situation even occurs relatively often, usually I accelerate to drive to the right, then overtake me densely crowded faster vehicles and I don’t come over anymore left, because in front of me suddenly a slower vehicle is. That’s annoying for me, because (who adheres to the traffic rules) vehicles that are against the vehicles can change completely, or can I drive to the left of the other car without being guilty of coercion? It is a matter for the European Parliament to take a decision on this matter.

Hello, I have a car (which parked and unexpectedly opened the car door) when I wanted to drive past the car door. Who is to blame? Do I have to drive in such a way that I can brake in time at any time – this as well. (But if you drive past parked cars it is almost impossible to brake in time) Or does the disembarking drive have to make sure that you don’t drive into your door??? Greeting Rogertim

Hello all, I can get a car whose former holder is no longer available. The car is no longer registered, but it is also the letter and the note no longer available. Is it worth taking the car and is there the possibility to get new papers? As said the former owner is gone, he is also no longer able to find about the court… We have already tried that.

Hello together, My father was towed, parked at a sidewalk sink. Okay so far as he saw it. So the car bought free at the towing service and drove home. After 2 weeks then the warning came from the city in the amount of 15€ (you have to pay clearly he also made immediately). Now about 6 weeks after that comes another letter from the city of Herne which still has an administrative fee of 50€ to him because of the above mentioned offense. The days still come by post. Is this now normal ? Administrative fee 50€ ? A bit high for three letters that could also be done in one letter?

Moinsen, what do you think of the bad habit in a few years, his car during a (only in football) World Cup the car with these plastic flags (which are clamped into the windows) and the mirror caps made of fabric to “beautiful”? What does the police say about it (whether that would tolerate this also at a World Cup of another sport … let’s say…hmmm……Badminton or something similar “mass unsuitable”? What happens if the cheap plastic breaks on the AB, a following driver scared by the approaching flag and an accident happens? The same if one with a mirror sock slipped out by the reduced look to the back and just missed a vehicle? If it goes to me, in NORMAL road traffic (not necessarily with the cheering caravans after a victory)->100€ penalty, 2 points after the new point system, 1 month run!

For a long time I thought they were telling crap, but today the neighbor got “netten” visit of 2 uniformed ones who pulled in his FS and his Harly. Reason: The CH police has a new kind of speed camera. With these at a distance before the speed camera microphones on the road edge the volume of the vehicle, it is too loud, flashes, with noise protocol. gladly used at the village exit or on the Poser tracks. Whereby I appreciate this as a resident at the village exit very much there especially motorcycle seems to be worth it, there are more ads due to noise than because of speed. The driver’s license is probably also gone very quickly, especially if the vehicle is more than 15% louder than it is allowed. Crimes: -cause avoidable noise -extreme acceleration -unapproved technical changes to the vehicle -usw…. Usually there is a visit at home by the police or in rare cases if a stop was placed e the measure directly on site incl. walk home. Then in the follow-up of the complete penalty catalogue (DB killer removed, exhaust changed etc.) with horrendous buses and driving license withdrawal.