Category: Verkehr & Sicherheit Forum

The other day I had the bad luck to drive a nail in the rear left tire. At the friendly one a short phone call, the problem described and then drove out to him. When driving I noticed then, that above all the acceleration was barely 50% of the normal condition, also the driving behavior was a little spongy. So as soon as possible (without detours) drove to the friendly one, and there let the tire look. It was half 6, at 6 the workshop closes, from therefore I understand there no one wanted to look at my problem properly anymore. Anyway, the service consultant, who is probably due for a new tire, said that he wanted to add one for 130€. Since I bought these tires for 55€ the piece at Pneumobil, I did not see this price at all and asked to exchange the loaded tires for the spare wheel (fully). The service consultant refused to do so on the grounds that it was not allowed to use mixed tyres. I mean 3 summer tires with ALU rims, and 1 summer tire (other manufacturer, was included with vehicle purchase) with steel rims. The tires have the same dimensions, profile depth difference is 3millimeters. I would really like to know if it is forbidden to drive with such a constellation for a short time or if I should only be pushed to buy an overpriced tire.

hello together want to know what I have a friend who had a bit of a smoke yesterday is his license in danger when he is driving again tomorrow??? how long do you have to expose yourself to driving when you have smoked something he is just a jelly smoker full of glue 1X in the month. greetings

Tach, I just got a love letter from the cantonal police Zuerich, I was driving too much on the motorway A1 a month ago 11 km/h (measured 117 -6 margin) and should therefore transfer 75 euros to an account of the post bank in Karlsruhe…. First: 11 km/h on the highway in the unfavorable area (no construction site, no accident, nothing.) ??? Second: 75 euros?? I think I spin. I know that elsewhere the penalties are higher than in Germany, but for 11 km/h on a carbah. I don’t see how much to pay. Therefore, my question: Can those who enforce it at all? Further, how can I deal with it? Third, what consequences do not pay if it is not issued? Thank you for all the useful answers, Dj

Hello, I think it’s getting so stupid that the pedestrian protection, all new cars coming onto the market, “must be disfigured into ugly monsters”. Yes, because the legislator prescribes this. So the next mini should become another 22cm longer, only because of the pedestrian protection. If you look at the new high side lines at Mercedes, you almost get the k… Even the smart was totally disfigured at the front lights. I wonder what all this brings, and how much In any case, I’m not aware of a single accident with pedestrians, apart from alcoholics who are fooling around. Or are new car drivers now becoming more unpredictable Raudis, which all pedestrians are allowed to ram away? Protection is available. Yes, then it’s best if soon on all cars still 20 cm foam, stick to the shock bar. The huge shock bars, the next Ford Ka’s one makes then best out of flummigum, the unprepared And pedestrian traffic lights are hardly needed anymore, when this new Rambo road behavior prevails. ^^ You finally have a pedestrian-friendly car, and therefore you don’t need to keep your eyes open anymore, *ironie* What does the pedestrian protection bring me when I am hit by an X5? There I am one way or another flat. Nee, then rather the old Mini, who was not so high. 😉 Gruss, Andy

Good evening! I am new to the forum and wanted to ask for advice in the following case. It is the case that I got a letter for the hearing because of a traffic violation and that is the disregard of the overtaking ban with a truck accused. As a witness is stated ****, POR VPI Bayreuth, although no one has stopped me nor do I remember having overtaken me without traffic. In the hearing not my license plate, but the trailer registration plate was indicated. phone request was only said that a witness saw this. Now I do not want to be wronged by someone and want proof that I really did. Was someone in a similar situation and could give me good advice? Thank you in advance and many greetings ***** the name of the official I removed -twindance/MT-moderation

Hello people I don’t know op can help me there one and that I was checked in the year 16.09. 2010 by two police officers in a parking lot and they say in court that they have stopped me out of the flowing traffic to control me hold a stink normal control. Now it is that a well-known the vehicle drove there and put it in the parking lot he to the one load gin and I to the other and that I don’t have to stand out I had the en key and could then put me into the vehicle before then the police arrived must carry the control through. now I once as a witness my known who says that he put the vehicle on the parking lot and to the other I have another employee of the load of the 100% can say that the vehicle has stood as the police came. My first negotiation to that I then had almost a year later so end 2011. there the one official has put that as I put up above he was alone because the colleague was in the hospital at the time. The judge also only admitted the officials as witnesses and my witnesses did not. Then my Anwallt and I filed an appeal against the sentence and there was then yesterday 16.01.2012 a new negotiation before the regional court where also my witnesses were allowed to testify. But now the officer was also speaking again but for that the reason that it was long ago. My witnesses had themselves but also what failed with the reason that it was long ago now mann but the officials continue to believe and I have to reckon with a prison sentence. My lawyer told me that mann Rewiesion can put in because he believe me and my witness because one is indeed a more out standing one can please help me because I have only until Monday time naturally still faster sorry because of grammar and spelling mistakes. thank you to you

GW dealer doesn’t want to pay replacement parts Hello I bought a 10-year-old Polo 6N from the dealer about 3 months ago. Since we didn’t have a GWG and no dealer contract was concluded, I have a liability for defects for 1 year on Polo. (Effective 1/2 year due to whitening reversal) Now I noticed a defect over time. 1) The car did not jump 2 times in the warm Zusatand and wanted to start again only after about 1-2 hours. Dealer has the car ko 2) ABS lamp went on 4 weeks ago and always stays in this condition. In my opinion, the ABS was also not active, because it did not use on wet cobblestones. 3) Two weeks ago water ran under the glove compartment in the interior. (co-driver) 4) Last week the engine ran very funny and has hardly any performance. ( I think on 3 cylinders ) Now I brought the car to the dealer to have these defects corrected. Now I have to check and find nothing. In my opinion, the dealer only fixed errors 2 and 4 and also fully charged all parts. Invoice: 1 error memory read out / ABS / engine check – € 1 ignition cable and spark plugs replaced – € 1 ABS sensor off and install – € 1 set of ignition cable 45,10 € 4 spark plugs 23,60 € 1 sensor 29,60 € 1 air filter 12,30 € Subtotal 110,60 € Final sum (ink 19 % VAT) 131,61 € In my opinion, spark plugs and air filters are wear parts and thus to invoice me, but on the ABS sensor and the ignition cable this does not apply in my opinion. Or do I see this wrong ? The spark plugs were probably not as important for error 4 as the cables (I suppose that I should be sold here more because it was no longer work), but I do not understand what the air filter should have to do with one of the problems. I wanted to ask the dealer now in writing to ask me a new invoice without calculation the points sensor and ignition cable to send. Does someone happen to know what I can call myself (§ and / or judgment would be good) and whether I can lay down within the scope of material defects liability that the car is dry ? The ignition problem will probably be too difficult to prove because it occurs very rarely. ( The enough water falls however also rather rarely ) Thanks already for your answers.

Hey guys, something pretty stupid happened to me: I live in a 30’s zone and never drive a kilometer faster. When I left yesterday I drove in the second gear after a short time with stationary gas because I was walking around the computer on board… Suddenly two children ran out of a hedge into the road and I am full of iron, a child already had the hand on my bonnet… I of course immediately screamed at the horn and loudly around me. Only then I noticed that I A few kilometers more and it’s too late. But what I’m particularly interested in now is the question of whether I can’t do anything about the parents of the children? The children are not older than six and are just walking around on the street all day and I have the feeling that the parents don’t care at all what they do. Are there any possibilities? Have a nice Sunday yet.

For some time now I have always noticed that overtakers are slipping back very scarcely and immediately before the outdated vehicle. Since I myself am quite often comfortable with 120 – 130 things on the track and therefore quite often overtaken, I have noticed that this immorality is taking place more and more frequently lately. Sometimes I even have the impression that here a damage should be done with intention, because nothing is easier to swirl up small stones, which then the Nac last week, I had the pleasure of having an idiot pull back right in front of me when I was absolutely free, and I also got a stone against the disc promptly. Luckily nothing happens (only a very small crater). Sovie stupidity can’t exist, it has to be intentional, right?

Hello! During all the discussions about the “day running light” also in our widths, came to me recently the “day driving-like enlightenment”, the fog lights available on many vehicles then simply also to be used as day running light. For about 4 weeks I practice it, even if the law does not yet allow it (so far). Distances and mounting height of the fog lights in relation to the day running light are already correct for years. Actually prescribed!. Just not after, this Only one and only one would have to accept that when using the fog lights also the rear ones still remain active. But, what is the point. Just a parkingable “transitional solution”. For hobbyists also this no problem….. Therefore my question: What does in this case actually speak against? Because no LEDs would not be a counter-argument, even by the Minister of Transport…. Will also confront the ADAC with my proposal. But, what does it mean? You in the Mot Forum? After all, we are “The People”!! Thank you, greetings and beautiful WE. Look forward to your comments! Greetings Blacky from the Audi-A2 Forum of the MT