Category: Verkehr & Sicherheit Forum

If you bring your vehicle to the TÜV only later than after two years, e.g. after 2.5 years the badge is “re-dated”. Actually I bring a vehicle to the TÜV so that the traffic safety is determined. The badge is granted if the 2 year rhythm is observed for another 2 years. However, if I cover the 2 years by 1/2 year, I get the new badge only for 1.5 years. Thus it has now happened to an acquaintance. The facts of the determination of the traffic safety However, it does not change and therefore the plaque should not be awarded for a shorter period of time. In my opinion, the plaque should also be issued for 2 years. Does anyone know on which legal basis this is based? Are there possibly any court rulings to which one can refer?

Hello, if I’m on the highway quickly and one of them is driving on the left lane, although I’m free on the right and I want to overtake it, I always take the light horn to signal my overtaking intention. I don’t drive up to “2cm” on the other one, nor do I make a wild flash or something like that and even if there is enough space on the right. I use the light horn with sufficient distance and let the lamps shine “permanent” even so only 2 seconds. then run to the right and let me overtake. but then there are the experts who think that the light horn is only used by racers / pushers. yes I want to drive quickly and this also includes overtaking, but I do not push. today was again such an expert, when I briefly let the lamps light up, turns on the warning lights, then I drove on the right track and let the car roll out more or less, he apparently also, since I am getting closer to him On, when I was right behind him (he was still left) on the right lane, the right one flashes and starts to pull over, then I honk and pull a little bit to the right on the stand strip to avoid the accident, because I am still faster than he, I just pass right to get away from it. what’s going on in these people?

laaaaaaange history which is almost to cry is briefly summarized: front character is 2 row as with a moped, NO us character but just a “cake plate” which is mounted side to right on the vehicle. so stop: http://www.porno-karre.com/mediapool/72/727108/resources/7308185.jpg and JA das ding is 300mm vom Boden weg and also in an angle of 30 degrees readable. 1) control mai 2009 -> defect card due to “mark not properly mounted”. fault card at the tuv have stamped with the noted “mark placed to the right according to applicable guidelines” (to be proved with pictures) and given in due time. no “aftershocks”… 2) check juli 2009 -> even official…quotation “I know you, and you still drive so around” -> display. because of what knew the self net! 3) august 2009 -> fine notice because of a not properly mounted character. quote “since you have already noticed in May 2009 because of this delict acted sentence -> 15 taler in die staatskasse. to this day NO answer. from when does the fun expire? only to the conclusion: I don’t go around the 15th, I’m talking about that I find such a ridiculous. within the time limit appeal filed with 2 side reasons (e.g. the inscante fault card from the first time and an opinion of the tüv examiner)….

Hello, I know this is once again a case where you can only shake your head. I sold a horse truck registered in May 2010. I also made a purchase contract. The buyer also gives me an extremely serious impression. But since I had a lot to worry about, I didn’t take care of it any further and I assumed that the truck was also immediately re-registered. Yesterday the tax office booked off the taxes again. Then I am directly at risk to the buyer. See that the truck was standing there, and was still registered on me. The face color swarms very quickly on when he registered who had ringed there. From the conversation then came out that he wanted to sell the truck again. I then offered him to buy the truck back, minus the insurance and taxes that I had already paid. I found this more than fair. The buyer also agreed, but called me today and said that he did not do that. n wants, unless I’m ready to add 300,-euro! I told him that it’s pure coming from me, and I find it an impudence that he is now pushing up the price after my very kulant offer! I know that I have to report the whole thing to the road traffic office. My question is now whether I can still show the buyer because of fraud/insurance/tax evasion or whatever? Thank you for your answers….

Hello together, I have a question regarding a sale of dealers to dealers. The dealers do not have to / want to give a guarantee among each other. So we take the example now: dealer 1 sells to dealer 2 a car without warranty etc. but a purchase contract is made of course. (in which also all data / conversions / etc. are recorded) If now turns out that the car for example has a different engine installed or does not have the performance in the purchase contract g! Let’s take an example of an Audi 1.9 TDI with 130 hp as a sales car, but afterwards it turns out that only a 115 hp machine is installed, because it has been exchanged for some reasons. Can one then legally approach the dealer or have no chance?

Hi everybody, I’m probably wrong here, but I didn’t find a suitable subforum for my question. I still hope that there are some people around with a clue who could be to clarify a dispute. So my husband was on the way yesterday with my car, when he came home he told me full of pride that he drove according to Tacho 310km/h. Since I know my car I asked him which slope he flew down, because at 290 km/h real 285 km/h is actually the end. He only said: No straight track, but with tailwind. Then I broke out in sounding laughter – how could my husband only use this strunting stupid tailwind argumentation, which one reads again and again in forums? – In any case, I then first enlightened the normal wind are not very fast, hurricanes catch already at 120km/h and at a speed beyond the 250km/h he would have had to chased already from a tornado of the level F4 or F5 In any case, he remained stubborn (probably as a defiant reaction because I laughed at him) and continued to claim that one achieves a higher speed when the wind blows in the direction of driving than when it is still. I then admitted to him for the sake, “Well, maybe you get out 2-3 km/h due to the lower air resistance, but no 20km/h which really reached 310km/h, but not by “backwind”. The end of the story was that he slept on the couch and even this morning he was caught at breakfast. Therefore the question to the experts: Is the claim tailwind, from a certain speed total nonsense (as I mean)? Or can it be that by the lower air resistance speeds of over 20km/h compared to the normal final speed be reached?

Hello everyone! I hope you can answer me directly to my case because I have found nothing suitable on the Internet so far. I was flashed outside (motorway). Now a write has come to my dad (the holder of the vehicle). Tolerance has been deducted, so I drove 41 km/h too fast. My dad was as a passenger with us because we wanted to change the 700km long distance with the ride. There is still nothing indicated because of punishment or something. It is only a toos My dad would want to take the whole thing, now I want to ask if something like that would be possible at all? He could possibly make use of this refusal of testimony because I am his daughter, but that also does not make much sense, because in the photo it is a younger and female person who drives. They would surely follow the photo as I read it. Does it bring something to write about the fact that he does not have the right but would still give the information because of me?! Thanks already in advance.

Hi, I didn’t stand inside yesterday, but I heard it on the radio. At Stuttgart, a truck with vehicle parts must have flipped over. The complete evacuation took 10 hours, which caused a traffic jam of DREISSIG kilometers long. The interviewed police officer said it would have taken so long because you had to load the parts onto another truck –> and at this point I can only shake my head unbelievingly. My first priority should be in such a case. (after salvage of the injuries as well as accident recording) be the fastest possible evacuation of the accident site, not by reloading but by pushing away the remains in the road ditch, so that the road becomes clear. Do not want to know what virtual VWL damage there was yesterday. I once saw a report from Holland on AMS TV a long time ago, where this is probably done for a long time. First Prio –> Clear road –> Traffic should flow. Wanted to hear your opinions on this ren. Greetings zetterick

Hi together, after I have now found a slight track deviation in two vehicles and was taught every time in the workshop: 1. Streets are not flat. Due to their design they have to drain off e.g. rain and therefore ALWAYS have slight inclinations. Also track grooves or other factors play in here. The “plane” road, which one would need to determine during the journey, is in practice only extremely rare (I just don’t think of an example). 2. After a he of course a mistake can be made, but it is minimized by modern measuring methods a.) and when it happens, b.) during the test drive of the respective monadreise this can be determined. Question: My car (and also the other one) only easily pull out of the track. How can I define (for me privately, in practice) whether the track has to be adjusted after all – AND: can I do that at all? My car pulls us Only if I don’t touch the steering wheel he pulls off the road – but only on a longer track (estimated at more than 100m). What to accept as a driver (yet) – not to be regarded as a pimply, unpleasant, annoying customer in his workshop and to invest unnecessary money in lane settings. Good ride! Torsten – the XC fan (with four same tyre profiles) n on the road, currently winter tyres)

hi, had attended a driving safety training with the operation, with own car success was – men volvo had to be towed – countless cycling caps flew through the landscape – another temporary technical failure of another pkw ́s who has experienced similar