Category: Verkehr & Sicherheit Forum

So now I come with a question for the “experts” here, although for ME the situation is clear. Friday the 13th, I drive as usual to my first passenger in the morning and must stand for it through a narrow road in the right parked cars. Then I bend LINKS into a dead end. Also there right parked cars, of which first with approx. 2m distance to the other road, an LT. Then followed a car, a gap of about 3m and again 2 cars. Behind to the next car a larger Lü 10m. So I’m turning into the dead end and I’m just past the LT, when a BMW convertible is driving out of a driveway right. Since the BMW driver doesn’t make any stops, although he’s seen me MUST (! I’M driving with LIGHT!) he drives on and prevents me from clearing the road. Since I’m driving an extended VW bus, I’m still trying to avoid the far too short parking space, which does not prevent the gentleman in the BMW from blocking me now. And now he expects me to sit back to let him through. On the sidewalk is probably under his dignity. Nevertheless, he drives a bit on the sidewalk and then thinks that I should go on, but what was not possible for me to touch the BMW or the car parked on the right. I also showed him this through helpless gestures. Finally, he gives in and passes. Now my question to the “experts”: what to do in such situations? According to § blablablabla, I would have to I was already in the road BEVOR he drove out of the driveway! The whole thing gets a taste, because about half a year ago the good man in the driveway (we remember: parked vehicles on one side!) came to meet me, I could NOT avoid it and he expected me to sit back in the dark (!) about 50m to let him pass! He, on the other hand, had the opportunity on the ziem What I do in the repeat case, I already know … is not the subject here. And, what would you do? To illustrate, I once made a drawing. I did not know what to do, but I did not know what to do.

Hello together, the EU came up with a great idea again. The EU Commission wants to have the main investigation carried out jubilantly! I have filed a petition against it, because it does not make any sense in my opinion. We already have a super TÜV here and every two years should be enough. I would be happy if many would sign the petition to prevent this nonsense. Thank you. Many greetings P.S.: I hope this “political” post violates no forums- Rules. Here is the extract from the petition: Quote: The EU Commission wants to present a regulation at the beginning of July, which prescribes an annual TÜV investigation for cars when they are seven years or older. So far, such an investigation was only due every two years. The date of entry into force of a new regulation is still uncertain. According to the report, the EU aims to standardise the testing practice in its Member States by 2015.” The German TÜV and its high quality “The ADAC considers that shorter test intervals for older cars are unnecessary. There is no investigation that clearly proves that a higher vehicle age also means a higher risk of accidents.” This makes it impossible for the German citizens to see any added value by shortening the test intervals. There are even horrifying costs, which mainly affect German citizens, because these are: “The average age of a German car is 8.5 years according to the Focus. The automobile club ADAC calculates with additional costs of a total of well over one billion euros, which could be paid per year to German vehicle owners. Above all, socially weak population groups would be affected, since they usually have older cars” If the EU Commission wants to standardise the inspections, then it can take over the German regulations and the German regulations. It is not clear why the test interval is to be reduced to one year in Germany, especially when one considers that the TÜV carries out the most thorough inspections. An entry into force of this regulation would imply that the TÜV has not thoroughly tested the cars in the past. However, the past decades have shown that the TÜV inspections are sufficient and the current regulations the traffic safety garan animals.

Hello guys, I bought a car from an Opel dealer just three weeks ago and picked it up last Saturday. Now I found out that the headlight wash nozzles do not always drive in correctly again but are occasionally semi-excavated. Furthermore, there is a metal tube leaking on the engine – I guess it’s a diesel line? Is this worrying? The line is lubricated from the outside and it has accumulated black shmodder. -> See pictures. by the way only concerns the first cylinder from the passenger side – otherwise no leakage and no scmodder. I have addressed the dealer – this meant it was a used car and you have to check now whether this is not more or less normal and must be accepted with a used vehicle. How do you see this? Do I have to accept this or can I assert a warranty claim?

The following situation: highway, 3-lane. Driver drives on the middle lane, speed between 120 and 130 km/h. On the right lane a truck, behind a caravan team. The driver is overtaking, arrived in the middle of the caravan team it pulls over without blinking. Driver has to avoid and pulls on the left lane. After making sure in the mirrors nothing was visible. Suddenly next to the driver another vehicle has appeared, which was not visible before. According to the driver, she arrived at about 200 km/h. Both parties then stopped. Then a third car (witness) arrived, who said he had seen everything exactly and claimed that the driver who moved over was definitely to blame and he would report it. On a factual description that one had to avoid the caravan he did not react. The two cars did not touch each other. According to the witness, the driver also did not touch the guardrail, but there was a sign that one had to avoid the caravan. Damage to their vehicle. However, no such noises could be seen or is questionable if you are able to continue straight ahead when in contact with the guardrail and speed 200… What can happen? Thank you. Hage

Hello all those who have never been flashed, and here just want to make stupid comments, should be so nice and immediately look for another Tread and not spread their wisdom here. It is also not about me here somehow to complain or to be advised how I get around a bus money. I was too fast and will pay point. Only there is a problem. I am Swiss, and honestly I have no desire to fill out a hearing sheet at all and then to the posts Assuming I won’t fill out the sheet and send it back, what consequences do I have to reckon with? Because if this only gives me a surcharge of a few Euros I will save myself the effort and wait until a deposit slip comes. So what do I have to reckon with? For all the witty and helpful answers I already thank

The EU. will again… New cars are expected to emit on average only 95 grams of carbon dioxide per kilometre driven by 2020.http://www.tagsschau.de/economy/carbon dioxide112.html

Hello, imagine the following accident: a motorcycle comes from a driveway, flashes and drives to the driveway. From the next driveway behind comes a car and drives to the road. The driver of the motorcycle can no longer brake and shoot into the side. The driver who has taken the driveway from the motorcyclist will claim to the police afterwards he would have thought because of the turn signal the motorcyclist wants to turn next to in again and not straight white The motorcyclist still had about 3-4 s on the main road before he turned it off (logically, you always make it after turning it off). The consequences of the accident were very serious injuries to the motorcyclist (speed far below the permitted HG), minor damage to the motorcycle and the car. What do you think would come out of such a case of guilt distribution? What should the injured person or his family do about possible As a result of the hospital stay the biker has to fail several duties. I would be happy if you could give me a rough orientation. I am not involved in the accident but only friends with the motorcyclist. Greetings, winter

Hello forum, I hope I have chosen the right forum for my topic… The following situation (it’s been a while), so we’re going back to the summer 08 again, played off on the Arlberger expressway (in the direction of Arlbergpass). Shortly after Bludenz-Bings we’re going up the mountain for a short 2-track. There the traffic stopped due to a construction site at the end of the 2-track extended route (according to traffic news on the radio 10-15 km ??? and over one hour waiting time) It started g not forward. Anyway I arrived there and when I was there where it becomes 2-track, I see that all vehicles were on the right lane in the traffic jam and not a single car used the left. There was also nowhere a sign that the left lane is locked or you are not allowed to use it. Anyway I put the turn signal out and on the left past the traffic jam (I was the first, a second and a third vehicle made it after me) Only some drivers of my project were practicing My thought was after a while “I’m allowed to drive around” so again turn signals out and also past the blockers of the left track. Then I experienced something that I have never experienced before. I or my car was spat at, insulted, skunked by the people standing on the right track. I went up to the construction site and put myself there and had to laugh at what had just happened. What do you say to the incident, would you have acted exactly like me or would you have ranked yourself well like the others on the right ? Bzw. how does this look legally, was my behavior ok or not ? I can use both tracks in traffic jams, drive forward and then place them in the zipper !?

Hello, the penultimate weekend in Hamburg: A concert, just in front of the venue parking spaces, apparently reserved for the NDR with signs: Absolute stop ban, from 29.11.2008 to 31.11.2008 I looked at it twice, but it was actually the 31.11.2008 on the sign. Was already trying to place me there, but I finally avoided the discussion. What does this look like now? Isn’t such a wrongly painted sign completely invalid? Soz Would you get away with it in court? Just as an objection to a roll with false §-statement always succeeds. Many greetings CoolHH

Hello, I have the following questions for you and I hope someone can help me with this, and this is about the following topic: I (small car dealer) bought a Porsche Cayman S (half-year car) from a dealer whose private vehicle I sold to a customer from my workshop after a short time. The vehicle cost him about 70,000 €. This customer was then at the Porsche dealer and there he has his first annual inspection. There it was found that the vehicle was already a total damage and then his lawyer had sent me a letter, with the request to return this 70,000 € immediately to the customer. However, when I had bought the vehicle at the time, the seller assured me that the vehicle would be accident-free. Apparently that was not the case. 1. Then my question whether I was against the then salesman, who insured me with an accident-free vehicle, a And if so, a few tips or a good lawyer who can help me would be very helpful. 2. What would the same problem look like if a trader were to take me in the same way as a private man? What is brutally annoying me is the fact that through such “trotting” we traders have to fight for our existence and put our credibility at risk and I don’t see it that only the dealer is ALWAYS the stupid thing. I wish you another good day and I am happy about the letters and your help. Greetings Toni