Category: Verkehr & Sicherheit Forum

Hello, last night (light dusk) had the following case on the A31 (unlimited km/h): Car on the right track, with approx. 220km/h. Traffic volume low, i.e. all 500-1000m 2-3 cars. See in front of me 2 cars driving one after the other on the right lane. Notice that they are much slower than me, and try to change early on the left lane to show also that I am much faster. Well than I am about 100m (really appreciated!) on the left lane. I know a situation here in the north more often, but this car had no yellow number plates, so I didn’t expect the action. So I thought about a full braking, but then I went over to the right lane and still so just before the overtaking back to the left… in German: I overtook the car on the right. Everything else would be in a full range. The car that I had overtaken on the right was as wild as the horn of light. Now my question, IF it should show me (which I don’t believe): Who is right? Had I had to slow down my speed in advance so far that I could have braked, topic: forward-looking driving, vehicle must have been brought to a halt in the field of view, or: If the car had not been allowed to slip out in front of me, since I had to use an essential h higher speed has arrived. Of course I tend to version 2, ;-), but is that really legal? Greetings, Stefan

Hello together, since the good weather again disturbs me the cyclists, who take absolutely no consideration in road traffic! In particular I watch the so-called racing drivers there. They drive mostly in groups, hinder the car traffic and view the road as their property. People can’t really go that way. Recently I have observed how such a bird still telephoned during the cycling and drove crisscross on the road. Is this also something to you already pa That’s very dangerous, isn’t it?

Hello, I have currently hired my car for sale at Ebay Classifieds. A few hours after I placed the ad, someone in broken German contacted me if the car was in a technically good condition and what price I would like to have for it. I referred him to the small defects listed in the ad and the indicated price as VB. Then he offered me even 200€ more than I had originally indicated as VB, the car wrote from a R eederei on site would be picked up and he would transfer the money to my account. Have already experienced a lot. My old winter car also took the Poles from the yard without vehicle documents, but a pre-transfer to my account??? Who buys the cat in the bag. It is also not 200€ but at least 4200€. Has any of you ever had similar experiences??

Hello, so I’m going to describe the situation: My sister bought a Fiat Punto `02 with 85000km privately in August of this year. Among other things, in the offer at Mobile was the note:” Super Carefree: Customer Service 05/07″. So now she has the wagon 3 months, when she noticed a rat, by the way, she is well 1000km far in the meantime. The rat came after her description from the engine room, after which she drove the car on the shortest way into the workshop. first diagnosis: 2 liters of oil were missing, but no oil lamp has lit up yet. Then the final diagnosis: engine damage, bearing entered, a barrel saw, because the piston bolt shifted from its original position and then hit the barrel. Oh yes, the seller no longer had the checkbook of the vehicle. Then on today’s call it turned out that he had the “customer service” not done in a specialist workshop, but “black” yes and if you calculate the middle running reading you get for May – August 4250 km and the 1000km = 4250km. In time a car can not lose 2 liters of oil if externally no leak could be detected. So for me the whole thing sounds like this in court: Either the buddy is to the fact that he made the customer service black and risks a procedure for his workshop, or the seller made a wrong vehicle description and practically no customer service was carried out. Can anyone give me a hint whether it makes sense to do so, it also has a legal insurance! Thanks for your help!

who of you can say something to me about the following situation: when parking on a parking lot of a gardening farm, I put back again, since I was standing sloping in the parking lot. because the parking space was narrow, I did this slowly and carefully and especially made sure not to tangle at the front. suddenly my parking help shrills up, I immediately (luckily in time) foot on the brake. pulls close behind me (about 50cm) a car still past to park 2 parking spaces further. at the off I asked the driver if they noticed that almost an accident had happened if I hadn’t slowed down fast enough. I got the answer (type indignant pensioner) jaaaaaa, they had to wait! my answer to it: they saw that I was still standing and was putting back! why did they try to come after me quickly then? they risked a potential accident there! they again: no, they had s After all, I have to wait! I again: but they see that I hardly had a chance to see them!!! then they can’t just drive!!! then I didn’t get an answer, just an indignant look, then she helped her man out of the car, who couldn’t do it anymore. who was right? is that clearly regulated? I always thought §1 was not at the beginning for nothing! to make this clear again: the other is, while I’m waiting back Manoeuvring after me and pushing by with little distance.

Hello first of all, I have a problem, which I would like to put here in the forum to all. And this is about, I sold my car last week (privately to private) he arrived and paid cash. Couple of days later he called me again and told me that the lock on the driver’s door is broken and the car can not be opened from the outside and I should participate for the cost (300€). the car was sold without any kind of gun services. If I did not follow this he has informed me that otherwise he will withdraw from the purchase contract (anything of 2 weeks right of withdrawal mean he???). I have had no idea of the broken lock and do not see that I have to participate now. Can you tell me who is right??? must I pay the reperature ??? problem is that he has not notified the car as it looks yet…. I would be very grateful for your help. gruss MT friend

Quotation: Directive 2009/30/EC of the European Parliament obliges all Member States to market petrol with a maximum of 10 % by volume fuel ethanol (bioethanol) under the industry abbreviation E10 (of ethanol 10%), thereby reducing dependence on the oil-producing countries. According to the EU Directive, for vehicles which do not tolerate this type E10, the existing petrol as a so-called conservation site must continue to be offered at least until 2013 After that, only the petrol type Super Plus will be available for the vehicles that do not tolerate the fuel with 10% ethanol. Diesel vehicles are not affected by the change. So it is in Wikipedia. Now, however, I read in the local press that car manufacturers from other European countries do not align their vehicles at all to E10, even warn against refueling this fuel when visiting Germany. Does anyone know more about this? Is E10 again a German (tube-creep) drive, similar to the exhaust badges, whose effectiveness today is proven to tend towards zero? Many greetings, Markus.

Hello together, can one of you tell me from when there is a barrier to the oncoming traffic while overtaking? In my case it was like this: I and my co-driver drove on Sunday two weeks ago on a country road as the last car of a total 3. The first car turned left into a dirt road. The car driving in front of me came as always no longer into the corridors and crept in front of me with about 40 km/h. Then I looked at the opposite road and had approx. 400-450m clear view to the next place I quickly overtook the car and snapped again. The only stupid thing about it was that the police came to meet me. The police immediately turned around and made a roar of blue light and siren uprising to stop me. The extremely unfriendly policeman accuses me of overtaking me with a hindrance to the back traffic, as they apparently had to slow down. But don’t understand why they had to slow down, since my opinion is that nac h there was enough distance. Anyway, today there was a fine of more than 123.50 euros and three points in Flensburg in the mailbox. I feel pretty fucked up and would like to know what I have everything for possibilities. I hope someone can help me. Thank you in advance. Greeting Matthias

So, then I have to get rid of something. I was on the way last Friday near Mainz and wanted to go towards Saarbrücken. So I was on the A60 (I think I) and had to switch to the A671 (I think I). On the A60 is a descent that leads to the A671. What surprised me is that on the 2 lane A60 the traffic flowed to the left and stopped to the right. I thought “Mist, traffic jam on the A671. So nice to the right and when I came to the descent I had to be very surprised. The 2!!! traily descent was completely full on the right track and the left track which flows after about 600 meters in the right track was totally orphaned. Thus, due to the inability of some drivers a traffic jam on the A60 was created which did not have to be. So I passed all the left, behind me still 2-3 cars and so I drive and see front a Mercedes convertible with one I think in the mid-sixties. He discovers me in the rear mirror and pulls nicely into the middle. but the good gentleman had seen me and stayed nice in the middle. Of course I got angry and had to evade almost to the left in the ditch to pass by. I looked over but he ignored me nicely. Well, after initial trouble I didn’t get upset anymore, because despite the “blockade” I probably saved myself 50 cars in front of me. Nevertheless, it’s still an un I will also be looking at it when, for example, I pass through construction sites to the front and then arrange myself, but that’s exactly how it should be done. It’s very bad if the track ends on the right and all of the tracks are placed on the left 500 meters before, everything is free on the right and then it stands on the back. So pass on the right (as it is allowed under certain conditions) and then put in the front. you will not always be allowed in the same way, but if you look nicely or have already pushed the car over that the other one can not block one anymore the mesmerizing approach to the picture of the highway of Google Maps: A: 2 lane A60 B: 2 lane feeder that ends at C: in a lane and at D: in the A671 flows From B to C all stood on the right lane and on the left everything was free…

The following happened: Uninflicted accident, Volvo S40 Total damage, had it hauled directly to Volvo. The following thing I want to do: The car has a residual value of 220 euros according to the stock exchange where the car was in for 3 days, the junkyard around the corner wants to give me 220 euros bar, I’ll assume that. What I’m afraid of: The Volvo employee said something about today. My lawyer usually means the insurance if I don’t leave the car unnecessarily (damaging duty). Said, Schrotti called, they looked at the car and now I want to take it there tomorrow. I’m afraid that the car dealership requires me to pay the stand fee. Can he refuse the issuance of my car? The lawyer doesn’t want me to pay anything there, the highest of the feelings. is an invoice that we submit to the insurance company.