Category: Verkehr & Sicherheit Forum

Yesterday evening I visited a friend in the Rhineland. I drove the A4 from Olpe towards Cologne and it was unlimited there appeared a GT2 and I thought to myself: Look at a playmate. So we played over 30km formation flight with all possible light signs, then the beetle driver had to get out, still thanked for playing and I flew further. Then shortly before Cologne a 120 limitation sign appeared and I immediately took the foot off the gas and left the car I had 210 on the speedometer at the time. As far as I know, there is no law regulating how far to be flashed after a limitation. It is also not unusual for the municipalities to improve the cash register by mobile control units behind the entrance sign. Only I am of the opinion here one should differentiate. From speed 100, or 70 to 50 to throttle down at shield sight. This is not a problem, but if you come from an unlimited motorway area into a limitation zone, this is quite critical depending on the speed you drive. If you are travelling at 300km/h for example and see the 200m remote limitation plate, you have no chance to reach the required maximum speed in time with a normal braking process. You would have to carry out a risk braking or full braking in order to achieve the desired maximum speed in time. And that stands for me in the diametrical contrast to road safety! A full braking in the middle of the motorway without visible danger? What would it look like in the opposite case? Let’s take the beetle driver not have left the train before 20km, but would have divided my distance and would have been behind me. Now I would put a full braking in the unlimited area when recognizing the limitation sign, since I must be in time to the sign at speed 120. driver reacts too late and there is a small tin damage. Would the beetle driver have the fault or would I have a partial debt because I put down a full brake without any apparent danger?

Hello everybody, let’s say that diesel is cheap at the moment. It won’t stay that way for a long time. In the basement is an unused 4000 liter fuel oil tank, which could either be filled away after conversion to gas, or with a 2-year supply of diesel. Of course with correctly taxed diesel, I don’t want to talk about driving with fuel oil here. Would that be legal? If the liter costs 1.12 today and on average for the next 2 years, let’s say 1.27 (in two years’ time it will cost e he 1.42 and the price rises linearly), then I save 4000*0,15= 600€. Well, maybe also a snap idea… What does the forum mean?

Hello, wanted to turn off today, had green, at the same time the pedestrians had green. Now there was a family (parents 20-25) with a child in the stroller. As they went very slowly I drove in front of you, whereupon the man showed me the middle finger, what I was repeating. To sum it up: Was reported, police was with me and have already admitted facts.. Statement “They had to pull back strollers so that I wouldn’t run around him.” This is not true, they went really very long My biggest problem is now not the middle finger (I am a student => daily rates at most 10€), but the danger. If this is recognized it costs 40€ and I would have to attend the construction seminar at the same time (~300€). I am insured for legal protection, but would probably be convicted as a deliberate act. Is it worth taking a lawyer at all? I am insured for legal protection, but if I am not paying for it and I have no witnesses. So there are no witnesses. Possibility to push the 40€, right? I won’t be believed anyway. Don’t want a lawyer, but only to know if it’s still useful to hire a lawyer..

Although it is already a few months lower nevertheless: in the morning giant stowage on the A66 of Mainz/Wiesbadennach Frankkfurt. In itself nothing unusual there, but the cause: mowing work! And in the evening exactly in the opposite direction. So the mowing work took place precisely in the direction of the journey, in which at the time the higher volume of traffic was to be expected, so that the traffic jam behind it was particularly bad. Had it not been more useful to pass the mowing work on the side In other words, in the morning, away from Frankfurt and in the evening, into Frankfurt?

Hello, have the following request: I was on the road today with my THW comrades for a little exercise on the topic of “savings from vehicles”, while we have also cut a bissel around etc. usf. Now I know of individual vehicle models, that they (my 99er Vectra does this also) make the opening of the central locking, if the car experiences an accident (sensors, airbag triggering or dgl.). If this is a MUST for vehicles from a certain year of construction, there is a legal Or is this a gimmick, which is voluntarily installed by the manufacturers? I had a discussion today about how to approach an accident depending on the type of damage, that doesn’t stop with such a topic. And I’m just in the belief that there is an order or a legal provision that the doors must be opened automatically to facilitate rescue/recovery work. Thank you in advance for the effort. Google helps me lei not because the stereotypical terms “airbag” and “central locking” are almost in every stupid sales item of a car cheerio

Hi, I got my new car about 4 weeks ago. I left my old car right at the car. For the sake of interest, I look in at mobile.de today and look for my old man to see if the price was ok. What should I say? There he was… at a backyard dealer in the city. Same color, same first registration, same TÜV/AU, same scrap on the bumper. But: 55,000 km less according to dealer. Just passed by (dealer h Is with 99% probability mine (is also a very eye-catching car; 3 similar ones in mobile.de all over Germany). Somehow I find this already brazen. What would you do? Advertisements? Go to mine and point that out? Finally, does it fall back on him…

Hello, I have an appointment in court this month and would like to get some information here in advance. To the situation: -30 zone – on my side of the road there are a number of parked cars on my lane – on the other side of the road there are vehicles in parking bays – Resulting road width approx. 4.5- 5m Accident: I come with my car to the narrow spot and see that an Astra comes to me, because the Astra drives nicely on its right track, I also drive right orienti a few days later, I get an accusation that the Astra has gone into a parked vehicle, which was parked in the parking bay, and that I should pay for the damage (100Euro) plus illegality plus 1 point, because I should not have observed the legal driving regulations. Since I have an legal protection insurance I have filed an appeal and now it comes to the trial. How do you see this case? Is there a minimum width for the vehicles where I have to wait? He hasn’t touched my vehicle so I can’t help it if he can’t estimate his car properly? Would be very grateful for qualified answers! Greetings battery changer

Hello forum, since demographic change also brings us more and more older people in the road traffic, there should also be changes/shifts in this area in the future. Say: More (older) people will stroll on the streets, which goes hand in hand with more unconcentration, more uncertainty, more slow drivers and more people, who still feel right even when they have just driven the biggest boot together. How do you see this? And please don’t forget!!!! 1) We all get old (e) …drivers 2) This thread should not be misused to pull over older people… that would be out of place and could also lead to increased moderator work… Greeting Berti

Hello, the following situation: A cycle path runs parallel to a non-predominant road and crosses at a T-crossing the arriving transverse road. What is the rule of advance here? (Skizze see Appendix) (1) In case that the cycle path belongs to the road, right-front left applies? (2) In case that the cycle path does not belong to the road, because too far away (8m?) is it a crossing of the road? No matter how, in both cases cyclists are kept in front of vehicles coming from the right In the second case, even for vehicles coming from the left? Case 2 can almost be ruled out in this situation, since only cycle paths with signs 237 can be marked, the road accompanying, therefore at a distance of up to 8m in the crossing area, run from the road. And signs 237 (even with indication of direction!) is available. Specifically, this question arises to me, because when I braked yesterday and stopped to let a car out of the cross road, a child of At the back of the bike. It’s nothing, but of course the question is whether cyclists have a special regulation there again (like to pass at a traffic light to the right)? Greetings, HoggaeImage removed due to copyright by Blue346L, MT moderation. It is not clear from the picture which map provider the picture is. However, since the terms of use of almost all mapping services prohibit the publication of the map material, I remove the picture.

Hey!! I was filling in at a petrol station in Cologne on 15.5.2012. I definitely filled in diesel – on the receipt was also DIESEL billed. After about 80 km my car simply went out, I had to roll it on the side stripes and fetch the ADAC. It came out that I had petrol in the tank. So towing, pumping, hoses exchange = 1,400 € in costs. Who also filled it or who did similar things happen during this period?