Hello I have the problem that my scooter despite ignition spark and a noticeable compression (by keeping the hole of the spark plug tried) and petrol in the carburetor did not start after I had cleaned the carburetor once it did not jump any more. then I ordered my new one and again tried to do it again. after that I saw that the membrane block has not completely closed and therefore was leaking now I ordered a new one built and now it still doesn’t go on. then I kept a finger on the spark plug again and you feel a certain pressure .despite everything the scooter doesn’t want to start petrol is still in the tank where could now still be the error
Blog
-
A3 3.2 Quattro – performance problems?
Hello dear Audi friends, actually I was always a fan of the TT 3.2, but today this, to be exact on the A14, Magdeburg – Leipzig, changed like a flash. Behind me was an A3, which slowed down quite sportyly to me. Since I could not go forward (truck race), I made a short space and left the A3. At the rear was the type 3.2 Quattro printed (that is the same machine as in the TT?). The A3 went over to the right, I passed. From Tacho 230km/h the distance slowly increased – no worlds, but my car was faster. How can that be? According to the test values, the 3.2r around WELTEN is faster than an Opel Vectra C V6 automatic (car, MJ05, 6,000km), which I moved. To save honor of the A3: I was alone in the vehicle, he with 2 men. Conclusion: 80-170 km/h light advantages Opel, 170-200km/h level (or a little stronger for the Audi because I was in the wind shadow), 200-230 slightly stronger for the Opel, 230-260 significantly stronger for the Opel (all speedometer values). I don’t want to rumble here, it’s just an experience that I can’t understand and therefore describe.
-
Foglights – again a question of quality!?
Hello to each other, what does it look like with your fog lights, now in the wet season. Mine are unfortunately quite foggy inside…! I know, of course, that fog lights are “ventilated” and that is also a certain “fog” i.e. (had this also with my previous car) but I wonder how much there is to be called “normal” and when the limit to the lack is reached. Would be great if you could describe your experiences to me, especially after longer periods of time. n rides in the rain. Does it even run when then how far, and how long it takes until it is clear again. Somehow this is annoying, are the suppliers nowadays to produce b**d consistently odential goods??? Greetingrelentless
-
Questions about the C5
Hello, I’m looking for a Passat replacement, and I like the C5 quite well. I have a C5 10/2010 HDI 165 Exclusive, with 90,000km. The car is sold by Citroen, with 2 years “complete guarantee”. The price is 15,000€, but here must be traded. Now my questions: is there a standard “Skiklappe” in the C5 to take skis with you? Is the “Exclusive” version automatically equipped with Hydrative III+? What should I do when I buy without having to take skis? In general, all the long-term tests that can be read online are quite positive. However, these tests only run up to 100,000km. Are there any serious problems starting from 100,000, or is the car still reliable? Thank you very much for your answers and many greetings! -k
-
R8 Purchase decision
Moin alle zusammen am also since September proud owner of an Audi R8 V8, also followed the posts in the forum for a long time.Have 9 years Porsche was super satisfied with, but wanted to drive something else.Had first also my mind because of the one or other nective comments.For example switch or automatic red vis or white vis BJ,depending on high consumption value loss engine durability etc… I have to say mine is BJ.12/07 Model 08 6500KM Automatic From A udi dealer with 1 year warranty For 68000 euros and the car is foiled in aluminum brushed, once you will not see again. All updates were carried out and must say that the automatic is absolutely in locating, consumption could be less, but goes for the PS performance in locating. One is definitely clear, a Porsche can be seen at every corner but a R8 quite rarely, stand-up factor 100%. Value loss for each car is also with a 997 for example, and you ka I’m glad to have made the right final decision. I’d appreciate your opinions.
-
Theft vs Vandalism, Judgments
The star was stolen from an old W124 combi 2 weeks ago. It wasn’t the first time, but now they didn’t just break the star, but they pulled it out standing on the hood. Besides the hip-wide footprints and bumps on the bonnet, not only he is missing from the star – also the ball bearing under the grille is gone. Insurance (HP and TK) says that the star would be theft, but the rest would fall under vandalism. The hotline did not want to follow the damage as a result of the theft, nor did it help to discuss with the person concerned. Of course, I can also understand that they want to keep the damage off their backs, but here it is not only the star (which I have always paid privately) but also sheet metal. In the case of a radio claw, the destroyed glass would be insured by the TK (but only because it is glass and specifically listed in the insurance conditions). but claim that the destroyed glass does not fall under the insured parts of the TK, but is also to be understood as theft sequence. Therefore, the logic in case of sheet metal damage should not grip, or ? In my view, this is the theft with damage consequences – is there something legally valid ? I would hate to run glecih to the RA, but to write a letter to my verse . Thanks and much success in the stomach recovery…
-
Km indication at conclusion of contract
Hello, if I have my new car insured, then I have to declare the annual running performance. This is estimated at 25,000 km, which I would then also indicate. What happens if I drive 28 or even 30,000 km differently than planned??
-
OLG Koblenz: Lower, faster and insurance coverage
Quotation: From deeper suspensions and other jokes Even if an unreported tuning measure is not directly responsible for an accident, but has only affected the driving behaviour of the driver, there is no obligation to perform by the comprehensive insurer. That was decided by the Oberlandesgericht Koblenz with a recently published judgment of 14 July 2006 (Az.: 10 U 56/06). Conversion not reported The plaintiff was owner of an Audi 80 convertible. A so-called tuning measure he had, among other things, lowered the chassis of his car and had the engine power increased. He had not reported these changes to his comprehensive insurance. Shortly afterwards he had left the vehicle to his son and his friend for a ride. At a speed of more than 100 km/h the young people came up with the idea to operate the handbrake of the vehicle. The car then fell into a spin and came from the road a b. In the accident, the friend of the son who had driven the vehicle was killed. The car suffered total damage. Insurance cover fails On the grounds that there was a case of gross negligence and that the owner had also failed to report the tuning measure, the all-insurer refused the insurance cover. In his suit against this, the insured party claimed that the changes to the vehicle were not in any causal connection with the vehicle. In the opinion of the judges, the tuning measure is the typical case of a risk increase notifiable in accordance with § 23 VVG. Since the insured person has failed to notify his insurer of the conversion measures, the latter is free from the obligation to perform according to the provisions of § 25 VVG. Although none of the tuning measures were directly responsible for the accident, the court is convinced that it is almost typical that such vehicle changes also affect driving behaviour and thus increase the risk. Especially with young people a special incentive is created, the possibilities created by the tuning actually excite. That was the case, according to the court, also in the too decisive case. Insurers have therefore rightly failed the performance. Wolfgang A. Leidigkeitwww.versicherungsjournal.de
-
Infothread PSA high-roof comb
In the new PSA high-roof combis forum for Citroën Berlingo, Fiat Doblo, Opel Combo, Peugeot Rifter and Toyota ProAce City, the topics for these vehicles can be discussed in bundles. They all use the PSA EMP2 platform and are technically almost identical. The topics can also be found reflected in the respective brand areas. This means that an answer can also be seen directly there (no double contributions).
-
Residual exchange
Hello together last week a car driver, fully caught me. My car is now total damage (the opponent has 100% blame ). The car was put into a residual value exchange but did not sign for it. On Wednesday I got the report. According to the report, the car has a damage of 8300.-€ replacement value but is at 3,050.-€ and the residual value of the vehicle 880.-€. How does this go on now. Have no idea of the matter. Does the car still belong to me? Can I Is that how it works (please improve me if what is wrong) I was told that a €880 on the car offered. That would now be deducted from the replacement value, so I would have to get 2170 from the insurance company. At the same time, I was also told that I could sell the vehicle for a higher amount. Is that true, does the car still belong to me now, or do I have to leave it now for €880 to the person who bought it? I assume that I could sell the car for 1500.-€, then 1500.-€ will be deducted from the insurance, or only 880.-€? That’s all too high for me. Maybe someone can enlighten me here. Is everything a bit complicated. LG Marien