Moin to all hope that I am right here. When I went into the new negotiation with my boss, I was offered a company car. However, since I live 40KM away from the company and the list price is about 5000€ gross of the vehicles, of course I have a lot of charges, that it would certainly not count on the 1% regulation. Now to the question. If my employer after the cost is offset e.g. a rate of 300 euros for the vehicle monthly to Za But I would be willing to explain the costs for the company car, would theoretically not have any money worth advantage any more. Could this work in some way? I have already ringed at the tax office but they didn’t know any more. The tax consultant is on vacation and the decision should be made at the beginning of the week, since the orders should go out there. Hope you can give me a little tip (: Dear Greetings)
Blog
-
Residual liability insurance, revocation & consequences
Hello together, I know that there is already one or the other topic here. But neither the topics nor the Google search have finally brought me further. No, I would say rather confused. I recently bought a car and partly financed it, for the first time! The seller said in Germany a so-called “carefree package” would be mandatory. On demand what the credit costs would be he meant 2,99% so total X and it would contain everything. fast, about 60 DIN A4 pages are printed and presented one page after another with signature fields. Of course you can say who can read is clearly in the advantage and about it I am also massively annoyed today. What happened: Purchase sum: X down payment: Y Loan amount: Z + “carefree package” Interest 2.99 % = Total loan amount As collateral for the loan the cession of the vehicle and the wage attachment were given. Then follow 3 pages to the credit agreement together with cancellation instructions (1 4 days) and some pages GTC ́s for payment, what happens if, use of the card functions etc. Following 2x insurance information including cancellation policy with 30 days. The insurance consists of 2 packages, 1x death, 1x unemployment etc. In addition, there is there, which one receives the documents together with cancellation policy again within one week and the cancellation period of 30 days from there applies. Now more than 20 days have passed and I still do not receive the documents again Only a “welcome letter” from the bank with the summary from the credit agreement (a Din A4 page). Well, can I really revoke the RSV separately within 30 days? Does the credit agreement remain unaffected by this? I feel a little messed up as the interest rate has nothing to do with 2.99% at all. In addition, I already have various insurances to cover all the mentioned risks. Since the car is already picked up and registered I do not want to use the I would like to provide extracts of the contract if it helps to clarify the situation clearly. VG
-
Revoke/announce residual liability insurance? (Commerz Finanz)
Hello I’m new here and have a few questions at once. I bought a new car last week. About half of the purchase price is financed by Commerz Finanz. The dealer said that it comes out the same with the financing, whether I take the RSV with me or not. I now have favorable interest rates. If I had omitted the RSV, the interest would have risen, so that I would have come to the end almost the same amount. Sound plausible first. For this RSV I pay approx. €550, which were included in the financing (at 1.99%). Questions that appeared afterwards:1. Can I cancel this residual debt insurance directly at the bank in writing?2. If so, is this reasonable in retrospect? Or do I run the risk that something will change in the financing afterwards (higher interest rates etc.) and I may even be worse?3. In the case that I pay a higher closing rate and trigger the loan, I would get about €550, which was included in the financing. probably a part of the RSV refunded? Or is there no possibility? Dear greetings, Sabse
-
Umganston in the Mondeo Mk4 Forum
Hello Mondeofahrer, why in Herr Gott ́s name everyone is immediately asked if he has a problem, if he communicates his opinion or experience here ???!!! Almost every topic runs out here after some answers in personal attacks. WHY???????? A forum is there to exchange opinions and experiences. But NO… here is immediately hit on one, whether justified or not. Everyone collects their own experiences with the Mondeo…whether negative or positive. I can not so far I don’t agree with the opinion of the others who are not satisfied with it. On some subjects I am also smiling and thinking about the questions and answers “What does he have again??”. But I think my part and don’t answer, or if I know, give a helpful answer. Sometimes less is more!!!! Do I get guts from you now?? LG MondeoWaldi
-
Advertising takes over, pop-ups, new windows, etc. I’m gone.
Hello motor talk maker, With all understanding of economic constraints, your partners and their desire for profit maximization, the advertising on motor talk has reached a measure which deters me from continuing to use this forum. What gives off the famous drop, which makes the barrel overflow, is the popping up window on the start page, which opens a new browser page when closing. That’s not possible at all. Sorry, but I’m past the pleasure of the forum In the future, I will contribute to other, smaller, manufactured or model-related forums. Was partly nice here, Bye Allen, Viviane.
-
Unearthing Old Themes
Hello, lately it seems to me as if more and more ancient threads are being excavated. Also often by users who have just registered. Do I just think of it or do I notice the other one? Like there is a reason for it? My suspicion goes towards the second count. Can MT actually check something like this technically? LG Moorteufelchen
-
User unlocking?
Hello! For a month the otherwise very active “veyron44” was missing in the Mercedes forum. After some users (not only me) had already been worried, it was now said that he was completely blocked. Strangely, because I never read a bad word about him. Here he was missing. Now even a missing thread was started about him. Isn’t there a chance that he will be unlocked? Can it actually be that a single moderator can lock a user? If a user uses it r is actually missing from others, can he not be SO bad, can he? Thanks for feedback and greeting Thomas
-
Praise for the moderator twindance
Yes, you have read correctly, there is also positive ! And then this should also be mentioned here. I like the friendly-relevant but if necessary also hearty style, with which twindance currently watches e.g. in the V&S . So it goes also and very well, I find .
-
Tests with red poor rated “not helpful” ….at once very many
Moin Motortalker, I am currently interested in the fact that a lot of tests (also by me) have been rated with red “as not helpful” and in the shortest time…somehow the dubious that many other tests have been negatively evaluated…and that in a very short period of time would interest me if there is a system and other users also notice this MfG Andy
-
Tyre width paradoxon…
… I call the thread times. I’m confused: My Fiat 500 got winter tires for the first time and I bought it 185/55 R 15 and that’s the well-appreciated Dunlop Winter Response 2. I always thought the tire was quite narrow, but I thought it just seemed like it was on the small car. (it’s certainly a 185er ) Today it was quite exciting for me at the supermarket parking lot, when next to me was a Citroen C3 derivative (I think a convertible) with the same tire width, but overall higher, n like a 185/65 R 15 tire by Michelin. Please look at the photo: the Michelin of the C3 on the right is clearly much wider, isn’t it? I measured with thumb and index finger, the difference is not only visible but measurable. – can one explain that to me? Was totally surprised, I am interested in tyres, I can even assign most profiles to the manufacturers, but I can’t explain this difference with supposed equal dimensions. 4 times to see if the C3 was really 185mm wide on the right side of the picture. Both tyres are 185mm wide according to the print, no doubt. Is it because the Michelin has less profile or why is the difference so clear?