Hello! I have a question about the injection valves for the M70 engine in the 850i. Original has my 850er (EZ 1991) installed the injection nozzles from Bosch, part number: 0 280 150 715 (OE-BMW number: 13 64 1 734 776 Bosch, which is more available). The different/new part number according to the chassis number is: 13 64 1 731 357 and Lucas. If you google the Bosch number on the original injection nozzle, you get a new Bosch number, which is 0 280 156 346. The Bosch number refers both to the no longer available Bosch OE-BMW number, but also to the available, new Lucas OE part number fits, according to Bosch, both with the Lucas and Bosch system. Does anyone have any experience, whether the new valves really fit and function, with the “old system”? Optically, the valves look different, but the technical data are identical and the dimensions should be the same. However, before I order the wrong valves 12 times, I wanted to Please listen to your feedback! Have a nice evening and a lot of greetings!
Blog
-
BMW 320d DPF Touring or alternative?
Hello together, since I have always been lucky enough to drive a company car and have never dealt with the topic of car purchase, I am now looking for advice on the purchase of a diesel car for my wife. Key data: – Budget 7000-8000 EUR – 2-3 / week to work about 15km (one distance) – space for 2 baby or child seats + prams (= combi) – trailer coupling – preferably diesel – power >= 140PS I currently have a BMW 320d DPF Touring 163PS Diesel in view. The car has 177.000km ru nter and it have been painted front and rear bumper (wg. stone strokes), new clutch + two-mass swing wheel (2016), turbochargers, brakes rear, cleaning soot particle filters (2015) and climate compressor (2014). Basically the car tells me very well and fits with 7500 EUR also perfectly into the budget. Are there any special features with this BMW, which needs to be paid attention or are other models perhaps better suited for us? Thank you in advance for a few helpful comments!
-
Links – LG HH ruling and previous case law of the EUJ – consequences for MT?
Hello and Moin Moin, this morning I found the following article in the local newspaper:http://www.shz.de/…/…g-verlinken-kann-advertising-advertising-id15556081.html So clearly to me the possible consequences, which can develop from it, but not yet. It says there that private users, however, are not yet prosecuted, then seems to be only a question of time… Now to my actual problem: Due to copyright I have been avoiding it for years, e.g. in case of help or questions in the forum, copy pictures from the net and set them as an attachment to the post. I use the link function. Now there are also questions about certain parts and installation positions. In the VW area, ETKA, the VW spare parts catalog, is recommended. This is of course protected by copyright, so can not be used. Help then offer foreign pages, which provide this catalog or parts of it openly for use. Links there are often placed for illustrative purposes. Are there serious problems for the user or MT? The disclaimer for the use of links on external websites seems to be useless in the opinion of the LG. So what do you do? Will MT delete such links in the future? Users warn or even block them?
-
Functional Proposal/Idea: Contribution links or contributions “virtually duplicate”
Here:http://www.motor-talk.de/…/…volvo-xc90-t8-hybrid-t5881525.html?… I just thought: Hm… if you want a purchase advice between model A or B… where do you post there? – in the purchase advice forum probably not as many look in as in the actual brands/model forums – in the forum model A you get mainly “model A is better” to hear (because there especially many model A fans read & write) – in the forum model B you get mainly “model B is t besser” to hear Such references to the purchase advice thread – as crosspostings – are then forbidden – why? Because of the (“storage” place? Then you would have to take action against the many fullquotes, which hang on 100 lines of text only a “jo, horny” or “see also so” on it …. Because of the clarity? Ok, also here: Fullquotes on the smartphone are not really beautiful – even on the PC they do not contribute to clarity. —> The 3 cross-postings per forum in the month / quarter with reference to the Kaufberatungsforum – disturb the really so? Or is it, because then potentially the same will be discussed at 3 corners? That’s why all the solution came to my mind: Create posts as a “link” – would such a thing be possible? I create the original post in the Kaufberatungsforum … and can then – exactly like a model classification of a post – specify up to e.g. 5 more forums in which this post should appear. The forum software creates d ann in these other forums automatically “links” (such as “hard links” or symbolic links in the file system) to the original post/thread. Discussions will then only take place in one place. This link option could then be limited to original contributions of the purchase advisory forum. —> Since there are already action or advertising threads that appear in several forums (at least in my memory), I could imagine that the forum software gives such a thing.
-
Animated GIF advertising from MT Server?
Recently the worst: Animated flashing and annoying GIF advertising from the MT server. Who made up the nonsense? Welcome to 1999 or how? Someone probably thought to use the too many user adblock and now all the revenge in the form of the worst kind of web disease has to be pushed in?
-
unintelligible titles
why can’t you immediately write in the headline the lying down immediately instead of just so stupid headlines like “help -a problem” or then in the brand forum just write in “ford” or “toyota” , these threads are certainly hardly read and there are probably the few answers , so people write please the subject something more precisely ,so immediately everyone knows that it is a meaningful thread
-
I can’t open various blog articles when I’m logged in
Hello workshop, for almost a week I have had a strange problem: when I’m logged in to MT, I can’t open a whole series of blog articles, it only appears error 50x and the popular image with the shielded shape, the Volvo and the warning triangle. This is independent of the device, operating system and used browser, so happens on the PC, on the notebook, each with Windows 7, with Chrome and also with the Internet Explorer 11 and also on the tablet with Android and C hrome. If I’m logged in, I can’t open these articles. However, if I log on to MT, I can read the articles, both with Chrome 49.0.2623.110 m and with IE 11. Logically, I can’t write, and the posts are not marked as read. However, since Continental’s blog article is linked to Euro 2016 in the forum, the forum (Passat B3 & B4) is constantly displayed in bold because it contains unread posts; the Conti article leaves That’s annoying now, because I’m constantly looking to see if there are actually new posts. I have no idea how to fix it and hope you can help me. Hans
-
Workshop of the insurance has not professionally fixed damage
Good day community, I had a car accident last year, a few days before Christmas. I was hit by someone, so far as good, he is to blame. Because of lack of time (and because I was not in my home town) I wanted to have the damage repaired as soon as possible. I was advised to have it done at one of their partner workshops. That sounded great, of course, because only original parts are installed. I also got rental cars (since In the new year my car was ready to pick up and from my layman’s point of view also professionally repaired. Today I was then to the spring check and TÜV appointment in my workshop. To this I described then also what happened and he said that the damage was not repaired properly. To the damage: – the rear bumper was completely replaced – the trunk flap was depleted According to my workshop wu If the boot flap is not properly fitted, it is only fast and good. Furthermore, the flap is pulled out in the event of an accident, which was then not properly adjusted again, too small openings between the flap and the rest of the car. Furthermore, the workshop of the insurance company had told me that the right rear fender, on a bracket rust, could break this. He wanted to repair this immediately, at my expense of course, but what I denied. Sorry for my layman Now, of course, my question: What rights do I have? Can I have the damage repaired at my workshop or do I have to go back to the insurance workshop? But this is 90 km away from my place of residence. If I have to go back to the insurance workshop, I would of course have the damage or repair checked by an expert, because as a layman I can’t reproduce what m I hope you can give me tips. mfg DS
-
Fictitious billing by private liability possible?!
Hello together, here’s a question that has to do with cars and insurances, but it’s about a private stick. I hope, however, that maybe someone can give me a tip. Today, unfortunately, an 8-year-old has “been stuck” at my girlfriend’s vehicle while playing with a big stick. Result is a 4 cm long scratch that goes up to the primer. Since the car is only 1 year old we consider to have the damage repaired – on the other hand, it is “only” a car. Wi r have contacted the boy’s parents and they were also very friendly and have immediately reported the damage to your private liability. This told me that I can drive to Hyundai and they make an estimate which then goes to the insurance and then the car will be repaired after examination. NUN TO THE QUESTION: I can also fictitiously charge like with a classic car sticky light damage – so the car does not have to be repaired and the damage value paid out or is this with a private liability obligation not provided for? lg Sascha
-
Repair too expensive, now lawyer turned on. What do?
Hi you guys, I don’t know if I’m here with my problem in the right area. If not, I ask you to move it to the right area. Or maybe you also have a page where I can be better helped Now to my case: More precisely, it’s about my sister… She stayed on 21.10.2010 with her Audi A3. Friends of her then called a “known” with a factory saddle who towed her and wanted to repair the car immediately. We/my Schwe ster explicitly ordered the car to be repaired only to the extent that it is ready to drive again. Everything else that would have been then we would have had it done in our correct factory saddle. We never got a correct invoice from him. He then demanded incl. VAT 311.66€ from us. What we could not understand until then, however, because we had not received any proof of the invoice or the like. I wrote him a reply to his admonition that we are still not willing to pay the amount because he would then have to pay no more than 137,14€ for it. We said that we will not pay this amount for it. From then on there were disputes. Half a year later, He wrote us a 3rd admonition (we have never received a first and second admonition) In addition, the wrong date is also stated on this admonition he wrote as the invoice date. I then wrote him a reply to his admonition that we are still not willing to pay the amount because he then now one year later, a letter from an official law firm in which we are asked to pay the amount. In this letter, however, the costs of repair are different from those that are on his 3rd reminder for example. In addition, there are also reminder costs of ten euros, interest, and fees for the lawyer where we are then at a final amount of 464,94€ Now I don’t know how The whole thing stinks up to the sky somehow But a legal protection was only made some time after this repair. What should you do now? Simply pay or make yourself stubborn I thank you already for your answers and for your help