Good day I allow myself to ask my question here as well – in the Peugeot forum I have unfortunately not received an answer yet and I would like to know how my dear tin pot is, so that I can use it optimally. I am proud owner of a new Peugeot 108 and want to maintain with him a driving style, in which I drive very low-touring and switch up very early – and accordingly the gas pedal very strongly, preferably full. Now is If the 1KR-FE in the interpretation as PSA VTi 72 is a so-called full load enrichment and if so, under what conditions? If someone could give me a sound answer to this, that would be very nice. In my vehicle documentation as well as the Internet I found nothing about it and the PSA support only points to following the switching recommendations of the on-board computer. hweiz
Blog
-
Smart warranty package with used Smart
Hello everyone, I bought on 24.02 a used smart from a dealer who is about 1.5 St from my place of residence. When I signed the contract, I asked if I could go for repairs within the warranty to any branch in my place of residence and he had confirmed that. Now I noticed some lack (the switch for the outer mirror does not work and the switch for the volume when turning up decreases by a few “points” the volume st he said that the guarantee would not cover it and that I should go to it because it could only be made out of culant. Is that right? WTF covers the guarantee? Of course, the link on the official website, if you want to look at the conditions, will take you to a beautiful error 404. Thanks in advance! If you want to get a look at the conditions, you can get a look at them.
-
Hail damage Reviewer error at residual value
Hello together, I have the following problem: On Whit Monday I got into a hail, in which my partial cascade-secured Polo V 1.2 TDI (BJ 2011) was completely smashed (disc on passenger side jumped, bonnet and roof completely smashed, sides also slightly affected). The expert then determined the following: for mileage: 133,400 km replacement value taxed difference: 6,600€ (6,445€ without tax) repair costs: 8,641€ –> so economic total damage He ha t then the car was hired at one or two residual value exchanges and the highest bid was 2,555€ –> Thus the insurance paid me out the following: 6445€ – 2555€ – 300€ (self-employment) = 3590€ Everything was nice and good. However, then when I wanted to sell the car I found out that the expert at the residual value exchange had lost at the mileage by 20,000km and had entered instead of 133,400km 113,400km. I reported this to the insurance and then have which said that it must be re-set by the expert with the correct value, otherwise the binding offer may not be so binding (because the dealers would have assumed a different mileage). I understood and understood everything as far as possible. But now comes the height… The new offer to the higher mileage are up to max. 3100€?! –> i.e. the insurance told me that I would get more now and therefore the difference between 2555€ and 3100€ of the insurance must be refunded if I sell the car. Now I am really confused. How can this be that I get less now, although the car is worse so stated before? May they interpret it to my disadvantage… doesn’t this have to be borne by the evaluator who actually made the mistake. Usually the car would have been reinstated at the earlier time (where the demand seems to be worse than r) and it’s not my fault that this has now been reinstated later and that the demand has increased… If the evaluator had not made the mistake at the time, then there would have been no second residual value investigation and thus probably worse offers would have come out at the earlier time, so why should I now bear the error? Has someone ever experienced such a thing or does someone legally know each other… I am in the meantime really over Orders… Thanks for the answers! Julia F.
-
Stand on the hose – registration and insurance
Hello, I’m kind of on the hose at my first car sale. The situation: My current car is insured with Insurance X and is sold privately in the middle of the week, i.e. papers go out for cash. However, since my new car is only available on Friday and I still need my old one including Friday, the handover is only made on Friday evening to the buyer. I already got the papers for the new car today. As far as so good. I would only like me n keep the old license plate and take with me to the used car dealer to whom I have to drive by train. Does this work that the buyer gets the papers from me on Wednesday, but I will call/forward at my insurance and registration office today and walk the old car for “from Saturday” quasi off? I think as I said totally on the hose what I do best in what order and most cost-effectively. Can someone help me 😀 ? Thank you very much about in advance.
-
Keeping or scrapping Audi 90??? What should I do?
Hello Audi friends, now I have to choose: because of TÜV I have to decide what should happen with my faithful 22-year-old Audi 90 2.0E. I bought it in 1997 with 130000km and thus drove 455000km km, now he has 585000km on it. Falling work: exhaust endpot, summer and winter tires down, recently long brake pedal path (I suspect brake power distributor), cracking on the front axle (broken spring vlls?), AU possibly problematic (run long without lambda probe), Crack in headlight glass and fog glass. Everything is not bad, but the repair costs exceed the residual value, which is full of 200 euros. And besides, he is now a damn ugly box. Last summer he also got two really bad hail damage. Even my boss once mentioned to me that this car does not exactly do well in the parking lot in front of our practice. For the car speaks: a. uniquely reliable. Drive it since 13 Jah b. the mileage of 585000km and that with zero oil consumption, first clutch and scratch-free switching of the first gearbox c. I hang on to it because it has served so long faithfully and I have spent thousands of hours of my life in it. d. it has D3 and swallows between 7.5 and 8.5 liters of replacement I would have now already for a BMW 525. There would still be the possibility to use it as a winter car, but then I would have to repair it anyway. Guys, what do you think???
-
Don’t you ever stop…
Hello, have a TT BJ 03/99 and this year already had some problems. Starting from the instrument cluster (remote lock defective), to the engine problem (engine ruckelt, gas poorly assumed) . Cause: Lambda probe defective. I got the LMM to a good deal on kulanz. Nevertheless, the entire bill so far amounts to about 700 euros. The defective window lifter (engine stuck), could fix itself. Since yesterday my climate compressor makes strange loud noises, was also right in the factory At the moment I drive on ECONOMY, so the noise is temporarily away….but in the long run there is no solution. Did someone have the same symptoms and how could they be eliminated? Greetings and a nice day.
-
BMW 7er e65 vs VW Phaeton
Which car is better???? Don’t worry I don’t ask because I would have the money for such a sledge but only for interest!
-
Buy 750i or not? Motor??
Hello. Would you get an E38 750il? I’m thinking about buying one! What do you say to the engine? I’m interested in most. Driving power consumption and so on. Do you remember the 326hp or is it similar sluggish to the 750i in the E32 with 299hp…?
-
Fuel prices…
Hello! is actually a topic that not only belongs here in the bmw forum, but I just put it here… In view of today’s petrol prices, wouldn’t it be time to go to the barricades as a citizen?! One alone can’t do anything, but I think if a large part of the people would stick together, you could certainly move something, right?! where better could enough people be united for it than in the internet? but except a demo, or d I didn’t personally think of a boycott of fuel companies… any of you ne idea how we could fight back? mfg daniel
-
Does anyone know about legal protection insurance that you can still take out despite damage?
It is about an accident and a now threatened lawsuit at the Landgericht in the five-digit range. Since the Landgericht unfortunately has legal force, I can / cannot defend myself. Therefore my question, whether someone knows a legal protection insurance, which can still be taken out despite a closed damage case, so that I can get legal advice