Blog

Hello, I have now insured my Golf 3 a few days ago and must pay at 35% twice as much as normal only because I am novice. so 800€. Now I have learned however, that a friend of mine, who also drives a Golf 3 and also novices is not even half of what I have to pay. Although the car is also registered on it, as with me and he also runs the insurance over a known and thus also has 35%. can that be that I have to pay over twice as much although we have the same conditions ? And can I make use of the right of withdrawal (you can within 2 weeks and the insurance completion is only a few days ago) and then e.g. go to his insurance and take the percentages and then also have to pay less ? because to pay the half it would be worth it to me in any case . and another paid for his ibiza at 55% also only 400€ with the same framebed ingengeben as with me! something can’t be right

Hello dear forum. I have already read and heard a lot here. Always some expensive cars are scratched. Out of envy, out of hate or why. Well, what if someone wants to invest a nice car. 80,000 € any new Porsche or something. This person has no private property and parks on the road. Now come some full-fledged and destroy the car. Scratch everything, kick in everywhere, hit slices, bite the mature, chop with a m hammer up and everything. Damage : we say ma 10,000 €. Yes, now the owner has bad luck because he drives such a car or what can you do now? Extensive? But then you have to pay a partial amount yourself. There is no other form of insurance to compensate for car damage. So especially vandalism. That you can bring the car back to forderman for example 2 times a year. Just unfair, because you are afraid to get a nice car. A garage is nice and good, but not You always park there. Sometimes you forget it, or you park somewhere else with relatives or friends on the public road. So how does an 80,000 € car owner protect himself?

Two weeks ago I finally got my car back. A Peugeot from a Hyundai dealer. Now 500 km from the contract workshop and two weeks after the purchase some defects occurred. So the seller asked me to drive to the next Peugeot workshop and have the fault memory read out. Among other things, the glow candles were defective and the fuel filter leaked. The Peugeot workshop phoned with my salesman and faxed him They also told me that the garage master of the car dealership only wanted to clarify the cost assumption. For me 500km from home it was clear that the costs had to be covered. The man of Peugeot also assured me that I was not ready to drive 500km with a defect car. I therefore gave the repair order. Later the seller on the phone told me that only the fuel filter should be changed. The remaining defects wanted to be replaced. I would have had to drive 500km home with defective glow plugs as well as a defective tank cap encoder (as a result of overloading the particle filter or something similar). Since Peugeot had already fixed these errors, my seller refuses to take over the costs as a guarantee case. I can’t imagine that I am obliged to drive 500km for such defects in order to have these repairs and can’t imagine that I can repair the By the way, when reading out the error, it was noticed that the battery must have been empty once (thereby some small errors). This was the case when I had tested the car before the purchase. For me, this means that the seller has never looked for errors or defects in the car himself, or did not let me look. Therefore, some defects may have been present before the contract was concluded. I have lost the fun of my car unfortunately. Thank you and thank you very much! Till